Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 7,053
He cant contemplate justice and continues to attack a kid with his pathetic name calling, he also has a chronic need to rush to protect one of the top two presidents of all time!are you having a stroke?
He cant contemplate justice and continues to attack a kid with his pathetic name calling, he also has a chronic need to rush to protect one of the top two presidents of all time!are you having a stroke?
are you having a stroke?
There is also an argument that they knew full well that the case was a loser and so wanted (or at least would be happy with risking) a mistrial to save face, the decision to charge him so quickly and to basically throw the book at him + to not charge bicep boy seems very political and a knee jerk reaction to public outrage to the shootings before all the facts were known.
I mean AFAIK part of the key evidence they used as their argument re: provocation wasn't even available at the time they charged him so it's not clear what they thought they were basing the charges on at that time... seems more like they went to charge him quickly based on the outcry then sought to find whatever evidence they could to support it after.
Protect him from what? Your uneducated worthless view that a video that happens to be talking about militia groups, and then mentions the violence in a location, and shows a picture of rittenhosue that was involved in that violence, means that Biden in in some sort of trouble.He cant contemplate justice and continues to attack a kid with his pathetic name calling, he also has a chronic need to rush to protect one of the top two presidents of all time!
Uneducated?Protect him from what? Your uneducated worthless view that a video that happens to be talking about militia groups, and then mentions the violence in a location, and shows a picture of rittenhosue that was involved in that violence, means that Biden in in some sort of trouble.
I'm sure there are loads of people on Bidens side totally wetting their pants right now that some poor soul on ocuk has a hard on because he can't understand a video.
Haha yes haha.Uneducated?
Have you ever tried to read one of your own posts?
Rittenhouse did nothing wrong and I've been ecstatic at him finally being freed all night
I suppose folks are happy an innocent person is free. That's always a good thing right?I don't get this level of personal involvement.
I'm not ecstatic, I'm not disappointed - it's just something that happened 1000's of miles away that I didn't really have any stakes in.
I didn't like the fact that he killed people and became a celebrity of sorts, with sponsorship and the like.
Biden was one of those neckbeards who made it political, classic chroniclard with his expert take on the world.
I suppose folks are happy an innocent person is free. That's always a good thing right?
What sponsorship out of interest?
But the poster said he was ecstatic, Others have said (paraphrasing) that it's made their entire weekend.
wasn't that picture the start of brcc controversy where they lost the support of people on the right as they did a ton of backtracking and people realised they were just a bunch of grifters?
I suppose folks are happy an innocent person is free. That's always a good thing right?
Mr Nadler tweeted after Mr Rittenhouse was found not guilty on all charges that the verdict was a “miscarriage of justice” that “sets a dangerous precedent which justifies federal review by DOJ.”
“Justice cannot tolerate armed persons crossing state lines looking for trouble while people engage in First Amendment-protected protest,” argued the senior House Democrat.
The right verdict glad the jury were able to see through the weaponised hysteria.
Harris seems mighty salty, she did have a career putting away innocent people though so its hardly surprising she would show such contempt for a Jury verdict that didnt follow the narrative she wants.
are you having a stroke?