Letter bomb injures DVLA worker

Yes something weird there, If the anti Terror can pick up on suspicious Muslim behaviour, how come they havnt got this covered?

I mean, we all know that it's them who is responsible!

*Runs for the hills* :p
 
Booner! said:
Yes something weird there, If the anti Terror can pick up on suspicious Muslim behaviour, how come they havnt got this covered?

I mean, we all know that it's them who is responsible!

*Runs for the hills* :p

There is nothing wrong with making that judgement considering what's happened in the past. I don't know why people are so scared to say it.

I mean, if someone believes 'all' muslims are like that, then they're just stupid. It's just common sense to suggest this is yet another terrorist attack by a stupid muslim 'terrorist group'. Terrorist group being the key and important words there! :)
 
I mean, Why hasn't this been stopped ?

Recently they got those guys before a beheading, they have also stopped many other acts before they happen.

These are regular attacks of a terrorist nature, yet it's being treated different to a case that possibly involves foreign terrorist groups (muslims for example)

In otherwords, If someone points the finger at muslims, this case would be blown right open... but it's being treated as a police investigation
 
That case wasn't, but there were other cases that have been stopped.

And yes i agree, but still you would expect that they have some way of discovering this plot before it happened. for example they stopped those other bombers somehow with inside infomation, how did such a simple operation slip past?
 
The letter bomb could confirm fears that a motorist is mounting a campaign. Home Secretary John Reid said the incidents were "worrying".
Someone is pretty het up over something, perhaps they failed their driving tests or got some sort of fine.
 
--->> points big finger at squirrel "you know tooo much"
;) :p



I know what you mean, but still i think that its appauling how they havnt formulated a strategy:

A.) to begin with so that it protects employees of these companys
B.) since the first AND second attacks, not enough has been done to add more security
 
Yup, I do think now though that they should drop congestion charges in exchange for stop of the bombings.....Not that i am making demands on behalf of the bomber or anything! but would be a nice "Gesture" :rolleyes:
 
its never the 'company' that suffers though is it..its some poor bugger in the post room who gets their fingers blown off

and if somebody can build an explosive device you would have thought they would have realised they only people they would hurt is not going to be able to sort out any problems they might have.

if they catch the person responsible the people who got injured should be able to burn the culprit with lit cigarettes to see how much they enjoy being burned
 
if they catch the person responsible the people who got injured should be able to burn the culprit with lit cigarettes to see how much they enjoy being burned

"Two wrongs don't make a right"

But I understand where you are coming from :)
 
Sirrel Squirrel said:
I agree with that, I think after the 2nd bombing they should have realised some sort of link and told driving authorities to be extra vigilante.

How should they do that?

I'll resist making the comment about speeding around town with baseball bats.
 
Back
Top Bottom