What makes you think they find "gainful" employment? Chances are they are nearing retirement age themselves and find that if they are out of work there is no"gainful" employment. There maybe some zero hours or part time work but "gainful"?Why should someone who is working age and not in gainful employment (claiming benefits) not be required to 'look for work' just because their partner has reached state pension age? There will be no work conditionality for the person who has reached state pension age.
Triple lock of a pathetic state pension? Big deal.The only demographic to have a triple locked financial and they dare to moan about this? Pfft.
The "pathetic" state pension costs the government £75bn a year so a rise of only a couple of percent costs billions. The introduction of the triple lock made absolutely no sense during a time where cuts were being made to government expenditure. The state pension should be tracking inflation and that's it. Fortunately since its introduction in 2011 I suspect inflation has outstripped or was very close to the other two measures so I would guess the triple lock hasn't cost us too much in reality, but that doesn't take away from the policy being nonsense.Triple lock of a pathetic state pension? Big deal.
Ditto.The indications are there for a long time. If you want to retire at a reasonable age, you need to save you're own money.
Many are in for a shock when they become unwell, or unable to hold a full time job leading up to their retire age. But worse than that, many just psychological won't want to work anymore yet will be forced to. In many cases it'll be because they failed to prepare for their own future
It's still pathetic.The "pathetic" state pension costs the government £75bn a year so a rise of only a couple of percent costs billions. The introduction of the triple lock made absolutely no sense during a time where cuts were being made to government expenditure. The state pension should be tracking inflation and that's it. Fortunately since its introduction in 2011 I suspect inflation has outstripped or was very close to the other two measures so I would guess the triple lock hasn't cost us too much in reality, but that doesn't take away from the policy being nonsense.
It's still pathetic.
How much would you like the Government to dish out?
Well, that was kind of my point. Unfortunately we have always spent whatever we bring in (or more), unlike countries like Norway which banked its oil tax and then use it to generate long term income via a sovereign wealth fund.We say government, really it's how much would you like your fellow working age citizens who are paying tax to dish out
Well, that was kind of my point. Unfortunately we have always spent whatever we bring in (or more), unlike countries like Norway which banked its oil tax and then use it to generate long term income via a sovereign wealth fund.
The Government are pushing private pensions so much because they need people to save.
The government? Dish out? The pension is a contributory benefit, it's not dished out, it's yours, it's not money for nothing.How much would you like the Government to dish out?
The government? Dish out? The pension is a contributory benefit, it's not dished out, it's yours, it's not money for nothing.
What we're all worth, in line with equal european countries would do...
The government? Dish out? The pension is a contributory benefit, it's not dished out, it's yours, it's not money for nothing.
https://fullfact.org/europe/pensioners-eu-uk/
You're quoting maximum figures for each country, so essentially in France and Germany you can pay more into the state pension and you'll get more out of it, where as in the UK most people pay into a private pension to top up their state pension.
The government? Dish out? The pension is a contributory benefit, it's not dished out, it's yours, it's not money for nothing.
What we're all worth, in line with equal european countries would do...