Soldato
I get the impression their car really doesn't suit this kind of track. They'll do much better at faster, more flowing tracks.
How does that work when his teammate Ocon is doing so much better?
I get the impression their car really doesn't suit this kind of track. They'll do much better at faster, more flowing tracks.
What confuses me is how DR is doing in the mclaren. Are new cars just this hard to adapt to?
I still think he shouldn't have come back.
I also actually think Ocon probably hasn't improved and alpine have swapped a over performing driver with an under.
This is one that surprised me and it's not like Norris hasn't had to adapt to a new PU either. I wasn't surprised that Norris had the beating of Ricciardo initially, but he's absolutely smashed him so far. I was a bit dubious about Sainz and Norris and how they would compare against top drivers or potential greats, as the only real comparison was Sainz vs a rookie Verstappen in one and a bit seasons at Toro Rosso and a fairly under par season against Hulkenberg. Given Sainz has been up there with Leclerc (though not consistently) and Norris is putting manners on Ricciardo I think it's fair to say they're both very good drivers at the very least - though whether they've got what it takes to fight for titles only time will tell.What confuses me is how DR is doing in the mclaren. Are new cars just this hard to adapt to?
I don't think he's as good as his pace shows since Ricciardo left. Ever since it has always been a one car team (and that's why Ricciardo chose not to stay). The car gets designed around Verstappen and the other drivers just have to come in and do what they can. You wonder just how good the car (and Max) could be if they stopped designing it around Max and instead focussed on having a stable and consistent car that more drivers can drive well.Which brings me to MV.
With perez now languishing behind is verstappen actually amazing? And all his team mates just haven't been up to the job? Surely it can't be 'the car is designed for him' excuse
I still think he shouldn't have come back.
I also actually think Ocon probably hasn't improved and alpine have swapped a over performing driver with an under.
Which means that alpine car would be higher up.
What confuses me is how DR is doing in the mclaren. Are new cars just this hard to adapt to?
Alonso
DR
Perez
All struggling.
Which brings me to MV.
With perez now languishing behind is verstappen actually amazing? And all his team mates just haven't been up to the job? Surely it can't be 'the car is designed for him' excuse
One thing I hate about f1 is how it's so hard to evaluate a driver. Because you can come up with so many potential valid reasons for them not being /being great.
Which brings me to MV.
With perez now languishing behind is verstappen actually amazing? And all his team mates just haven't been up to the job? Surely it can't be 'the car is designed for him' excuse.
Ocon is doing very well in my opinion.
RedBull and it's sister team have the same problem.
Only 1 driver in each team can drive it.
TSUNODA said that his data feed back is opposite of gasly.
And he can't work out why that is.
I hope RB go for Russell to replace Perez.
I kind of wish f1 had 3 car teams. I think it would help iron out a lot of questions
That would cause more issues. Imagine if 1 team occupied all the podium spots at each race.
You would think F1 cars are FWD with all of the talk about Leclerc's gearbox.