I don't think he needed to search much for that one tbh... you put forth a dubious/widely disputed position.
What sort of things are you thinking of re: "good information" being left out because is isn't approved by science?
No one is talking about disproving the double slit experiment? The issue is the interpretation of the measurement problem - you've put forth a rather old and widely disputed idea.
Yes, when it comes to science vs pseudo science one is credible the other is worthless.
"Leonardo Da Vinci mindset" ???
and your example of this is a guy who took a traditional psychedelic brew and solved his skin rash issue?
You're seemingly unaware with the issues with personal anecdotes like that or why we have clinical trials for drugs. If it does as you claim then it should be able to be replicated and shown to perform better than a placebo. Currently you've simply chosen to believe in it based on an anecdote from a documentary, that is inherently closed minded.
edit - I googled your anecdote and found the guy who claims to have been cured with the traditional brew:
https://www.energytherapy.biz/2016/...sca-how-i-cured-my-eczema-and-healed-my-life/
"Mark Flaherty is a practising astrologer with clients in over 30 countries. He has studied with Dr Geoffrey Cornelius, former President of the Astrological Lodge of London, and Bob Mulligan of the Astrology Company, Florida. He is passionate about sharing this mystical art and its relevance to our daily lives."
what a surprise, a practitioner of woo... and the claim made on a website all about woo
(as mentioned in my previous post this is way off topic still as far as the thread is concerned - it might be better to make a new thread re: spiral dynamics etc.. if you want to carry on?)