I am just watching Motorway Cops.
The situation was a Civic Type R with two young lads driving it. Suspicious I know...
The cops pulled them over on suspicion that it was a stolen vehicle, whether this was due to his age I am not quite sure but he had dodgy plates on.
They took him out the vehicle, but the lad kicked off about it and was complaining that he did nothing wrong. He resisted at first, but sat in the back on the cop car. The Cops then checked the driver, car and passenger and everything belonged to the lad driving. No stolen vehicle, he had insurance and tax and it all matched up.
They said it was an error, till they found out he was on dodgy plates (possibly private plates). The lad already knew about the dodgy plates as he was pulled over a week before and issued a 14 days notice to change them or he would be fined and summoned to court.
The cops then issued him a fine for £30 for using the car with dodgy plates, despite him already being on the 14 days notice.
The lad's point was that he was given 14days to change his plates, for all they knew - he could be changing them in the next day or so... The car company was the people who messed up the plates in the first place. So why should he pay a fine if he was already warned? Then they said they would arrest him for arguing back about it as he swore once.
I think the cops had a job to do, but were unfair on issuing this fine and also didn't want to admit the error they made on pulling him over and acting the way they did.
In the lads defence, they were talking to him based on his age and fair enough he had a lip on him, but they were being hard on him due to his age at the end of the day. Is this a form of discrimination?
Anybody else watch that bit?
The situation was a Civic Type R with two young lads driving it. Suspicious I know...
The cops pulled them over on suspicion that it was a stolen vehicle, whether this was due to his age I am not quite sure but he had dodgy plates on.
They took him out the vehicle, but the lad kicked off about it and was complaining that he did nothing wrong. He resisted at first, but sat in the back on the cop car. The Cops then checked the driver, car and passenger and everything belonged to the lad driving. No stolen vehicle, he had insurance and tax and it all matched up.
They said it was an error, till they found out he was on dodgy plates (possibly private plates). The lad already knew about the dodgy plates as he was pulled over a week before and issued a 14 days notice to change them or he would be fined and summoned to court.
The cops then issued him a fine for £30 for using the car with dodgy plates, despite him already being on the 14 days notice.
The lad's point was that he was given 14days to change his plates, for all they knew - he could be changing them in the next day or so... The car company was the people who messed up the plates in the first place. So why should he pay a fine if he was already warned? Then they said they would arrest him for arguing back about it as he swore once.
I think the cops had a job to do, but were unfair on issuing this fine and also didn't want to admit the error they made on pulling him over and acting the way they did.
In the lads defence, they were talking to him based on his age and fair enough he had a lip on him, but they were being hard on him due to his age at the end of the day. Is this a form of discrimination?
Anybody else watch that bit?
