Naked beastiality stage role for Potter star :/

The play has a great degree of artistic merit.

But don't let that prevent you from an ill-informed, red-topped philistine knee-jerk response.

[Edit]

And cue the avalanche of more of the same . . .
 
huh.gif
 
Borris said:
The play has a great degree of artistic merit.

But don't let that prevent you from an ill-informed, red-topped philistine knee-jerk response.

[Edit]

And cue the avalanche of more of the same . . .


in that case i differ to your experience and will attempt to watch the original 1977 film and see if its any good before looking at the stage play ;)

its just the discription of it on the BBC doesnt paint it in a very good light... hence my knee`s were a jerkin` :)
 
Not completely on topic, but what a terrible photo that is of him in that article, I think i'll be having bad dreams about that :eek: :D
 
I wonder why he chose to do it...my friends would personally ensure i never lived it down if i did something like that. I would always be known as the guy who got close to horses on a stage.

Good money perhaps?
 
Sparky__H said:
That makes no sense what so ever…

So he has some sort of co-dependent leech across his face?
What? :confused:

it makes perfect sense. What are you on about leech?
 
Back
Top Bottom