Lately, I noticed that many people as soon as they discover that some monitor is based on the S-IPS panel they are confident that monitor will produce the equal performance as NEC. At some places, I even noticed that Dell 2005/2007 is quoted to use the same panel as NEC. It's definitely misleading. I would like to clear such possible confusion and give some right directions on this matter.
Yes, they are sharing the roots of the same IPS technology (S-IPS) ... but panel type is not the same; Fair enough, S-IPS are excellent panels capable of brilliant performance (and they are my favourite) ... but NEC is based on the AS-IPS (A = Advanced S-IPS and it may be related to DVM ... I think, but not sure) and it's faster as it's boosting the impressive 6ms g2g. In other words, NEC panel is using the improved (or different) overdrive and completely different panel control circuit because of the Advanced DVM. FYI ... even Dell 2005 is using the LG.Philips S-IPS (LM201W01), but it simply can't match the NEC performance and display clarity. In some sense, sometimes it's not just enough that people focus on the panel type or origin strictly. Improved overdrive or advanced panel control circuit my bring the surprising results also.
Anyhow, what is interesting about this monitor is that even in direct comparisons with the standard S-IPS panels (like Dell 2005) it definitely delivers the stronger picture performance in the terms of image clarity, colour reproduction and deepness, black levels and contrasts. Surprisingly, this is even happening with the stock monitor configuration and without the Advanced DVM enabled. I know that credit have to go partly to the OptiClear ... but this is not the major player. Somehow, I'm starting to believe that they maybe changed something in the AS-IPS panel itself (apart from the electronic control circuit) as this monitor even at the stock setup and without the Advanced DVM is above the S-IPS competition.
Unfortunately, no "downloadable" tech spec is available for the AS-IPS. I collected some statements from the manufactures itself about the AS-IPS. Quite possibly, it may confirm my theory from the above.
"
The advanced super(AS) -IPS mode system for use in televisions, large-screen monitors and other applications achieves an approximate 30% improvement in the aperture ratio over conventional IPS technology. Furthermore, AS-IPS realizes a higher level of brightness and reproduces colors more realistically thanks to high-purity color filters and other proprietary technologies.
"
"
This unique design ensures consistent illumination, excellent color performance and optimum contrast-even at wide off-axis viewing angles.
"
It may quite possible happen that CCFL backlight tubes have also been replaced in NEC by a new generation which is capable of a wider gamut.
At the end, here is some interesting comparison between the Dell 2007WFP and NEC LCD20WGX2 (response times & colour reproduction):
Response times:
http://www.lesnumeriques.com/duels.php?ty=6&ma1=52&mo1=95&p1=969&ma2=88&mo2=106&p2=1042&ph=1
Colour reproduction (after the calibration):
http://www.lesnumeriques.com/duels.php?ty=6&ma1=52&mo1=95&p1=969&ma2=88&mo2=106&p2=1042&ph=6
Yes, they are sharing the roots of the same IPS technology (S-IPS) ... but panel type is not the same; Fair enough, S-IPS are excellent panels capable of brilliant performance (and they are my favourite) ... but NEC is based on the AS-IPS (A = Advanced S-IPS and it may be related to DVM ... I think, but not sure) and it's faster as it's boosting the impressive 6ms g2g. In other words, NEC panel is using the improved (or different) overdrive and completely different panel control circuit because of the Advanced DVM. FYI ... even Dell 2005 is using the LG.Philips S-IPS (LM201W01), but it simply can't match the NEC performance and display clarity. In some sense, sometimes it's not just enough that people focus on the panel type or origin strictly. Improved overdrive or advanced panel control circuit my bring the surprising results also.
Anyhow, what is interesting about this monitor is that even in direct comparisons with the standard S-IPS panels (like Dell 2005) it definitely delivers the stronger picture performance in the terms of image clarity, colour reproduction and deepness, black levels and contrasts. Surprisingly, this is even happening with the stock monitor configuration and without the Advanced DVM enabled. I know that credit have to go partly to the OptiClear ... but this is not the major player. Somehow, I'm starting to believe that they maybe changed something in the AS-IPS panel itself (apart from the electronic control circuit) as this monitor even at the stock setup and without the Advanced DVM is above the S-IPS competition.
Unfortunately, no "downloadable" tech spec is available for the AS-IPS. I collected some statements from the manufactures itself about the AS-IPS. Quite possibly, it may confirm my theory from the above.
"
The advanced super(AS) -IPS mode system for use in televisions, large-screen monitors and other applications achieves an approximate 30% improvement in the aperture ratio over conventional IPS technology. Furthermore, AS-IPS realizes a higher level of brightness and reproduces colors more realistically thanks to high-purity color filters and other proprietary technologies.
"
"
This unique design ensures consistent illumination, excellent color performance and optimum contrast-even at wide off-axis viewing angles.
"
It may quite possible happen that CCFL backlight tubes have also been replaced in NEC by a new generation which is capable of a wider gamut.
At the end, here is some interesting comparison between the Dell 2007WFP and NEC LCD20WGX2 (response times & colour reproduction):
Response times:
http://www.lesnumeriques.com/duels.php?ty=6&ma1=52&mo1=95&p1=969&ma2=88&mo2=106&p2=1042&ph=1
Colour reproduction (after the calibration):
http://www.lesnumeriques.com/duels.php?ty=6&ma1=52&mo1=95&p1=969&ma2=88&mo2=106&p2=1042&ph=6