But surely you can only be charged with what you've done/attempted to do and not what could've possibly happened?
Like a burglar stealing a £3k painting whilst knowing nothing about art. They can't be charged on the possibility of that painting actually being worth millions.
She's not killed her, nor was it probably her intent to kill. Just a moment of rage madness.
That's the thing, I do wonder if perhaps the way we deal with this stuff is a bit flawed.
I mean say person A stabs person B on a council estate in central London in broad daylight, at lunchtime on a Wednesday, they're spotted and immediately rushed to a top central London hospital and given first class medical care, they survive. That person might get GBH, might get attempted murder... it is a bit of a lottery.
Say the exact same stabbing occurred but it happened say 20 years ago, the medical care perhaps isn't as advanced and the victim dies... or perhaps it happens today but it is in some small town in rural Norfolk and on a Saturday night + the victim is taken to a small local hospital with an A&E department already under strain from drunk inbreds.
The perpetrator's sentence is potentially massively influenced by things unrelated to the offence itself like the time of day and the skills + resources of the medical team etc... That shouldn't be a reason for one person to get 5 years and another to get 20.