Associate
- Joined
- 6 Nov 2010
- Posts
- 887
- Location
- Behind the camera...
As above, I've personally turned into a noise perv, I hate it, but I'm finding in these low light days that I have no other option other than to crank up the iso.
I'm using the f4L 70-200mm and concidered going for the f2.8 but for what I use it for even f4 is too shallow a depth of field, so i I don't see any benefit from faster glass.
I shoot at around 1/50th for panning and it seems the slower I go, the more noise is being produced. The only other option I can think of is a body upgrade but the only crop body worth concidering is the 7D (currently using a 550D) but the ISO tests show the quality and noise through out the iso's of the 7D vs the 550D show next to zero difference and the other features of the 7D are no benefit to me for what I use it for... So what's the crack with the overall view on noise? LR noise reduction can only do so much before ruining tye image, do I just grin and bare it or what? Lol
Cheers
(this was ment to be a quick question lol)
I'm using the f4L 70-200mm and concidered going for the f2.8 but for what I use it for even f4 is too shallow a depth of field, so i I don't see any benefit from faster glass.
I shoot at around 1/50th for panning and it seems the slower I go, the more noise is being produced. The only other option I can think of is a body upgrade but the only crop body worth concidering is the 7D (currently using a 550D) but the ISO tests show the quality and noise through out the iso's of the 7D vs the 550D show next to zero difference and the other features of the 7D are no benefit to me for what I use it for... So what's the crack with the overall view on noise? LR noise reduction can only do so much before ruining tye image, do I just grin and bare it or what? Lol
Cheers
(this was ment to be a quick question lol)