Permabanned
That is 2055mhz maximum and 2010mhz average.That's 30% faster than mine, its also over 2.2Ghz and the highest score i've seen on a 3070.
I think even you would agree its not worth it.
Heaven 4.0 shows odd core numbers.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
That is 2055mhz maximum and 2010mhz average.That's 30% faster than mine, its also over 2.2Ghz and the highest score i've seen on a 3070.
I think even you would agree its not worth it.
Thing is one was available to me for £469, the other was not. Not that that was the only reason.I think the RX 6800 is a better GPU than the 3070 but i understand that is not clear cut.
From your actions so far i would say no, but what i don't understand if your complaint about AMD's GPU pricing, you don't seem to have the same criticism about Nvidia.
I don't think outright cost is the indicator of value, its more likely to be how each tier compares to the top of the line. Assuming consistent, uniform improvement (unlikely) then you would expect the percentage cost difference to be the same gen on gen, for example just whacking 50 quid on to each tier. But if this gen, a 3080 is within 15% of a 3090, but next year a 4080 is 30% off a 409p, it will be worse value.
The underlying cost is only going up. Has a gen in gen difference ever gone down?
Hah! Righto - my two previous cards were a 670 and a 1070, must have missed it!GTX 770: $399
GTX 970: $329 and it was a much quicker card.
Hah! Righto - my two previous cards were a 670 and a 1070, must have missed it!
What do you think the new 4000 series from Nvidia will cost?
1. Cheaper than 3000 series
2. Same as 3000 series
3. Higher than 3000 series
4. Huge up pricing restructure from Nv
(directly due to what people were actually willing to spend with the over inflated pricing on available stock)
Can we get a poll please?
Just a bit of fun.
I'm not sure why the RTX 4070 would need to offer that kind of performance. I think it may be just slightly ahead of the RTX 3080 10GB, with much improved ray tracing performance.
now now, the ti killer was real, amd never launched the real 480 as it would have been mean to nvidiaIt’s all guesses at the moment. The specs leaked have already changed a few times. Take all this with a huge grain of salt.
I still remember the RX 480 launch
now now, the ti killer was real, amd never launched the real 480 as it would have been mean to nvidia
Higher than 3000 series without a doubt.
Nvidia tried their luck with the 2000 series, but since the 3000 series they've realised people will pay well over the odds.
A 4090 will cost 2k minimum on launch, and yes I know there likely won't be a 4090 on release of the new cards. The 4080 will probably be the highest end initially.