• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia fan thinking of turning

erm... none of the processors in that graph have hyperthreading?
all it does show is that a 920@4ghz and a 2500k@4ghz both get about the same FPS (along with an FX and we all know how rubbish they are)

edit; I'll run with HT on and off now and see if it makes a difference on caspian 64

There was a big thread about it on guru or overclock and people were reporting large gains with it on. Can't find the thread now, but loads of people were saying it.
 
Don't do it. ATI drivers suck ass.

This, although it's an exaggeration, it's all relative. I'm not talking crashes/bugs, as they're about equal on that (although I did lose count of the amount of DX10/11 titles which refused to run at 60hz on any driver revision @1080p, on both my 5870 and 6970).

Forceware has had pre-built application profiles inside the control panel since, let's see.. 2003? Ish? CCC still doesn't have that.

Until AMD cards have the full functionality of Nvidia Inspector; AA bits, SLI bits, etc. in some form or other (RadeonPro doesn't even begin to come close) I won't even give them a look. You get what you pay for, at the end of the day. Not going to go bashing AMD owners but that's the way it is.
 
Ive gone back and forth allot, from my experience;

Nvidia cards generally have better drivers for all games, including old games on new cards, and can feel a little smoother on some games.

AMD cards have better colour. I know it sounds strange but from someone thats gone back and forth allot its clear AMD have a better colour pallet and you cant change Nvidia's card settings to match without losing collaberation. AMD also have better picture quality and SSAA


In a perfect world I would have an card with Nvidias drivers and AMD's picture quality
 
This, although it's an exaggeration, it's all relative. I'm not talking crashes/bugs, as they're about equal on that (although I did lose count of the amount of DX10/11 titles which refused to run at 60hz on any driver revision @1080p, on both my 5870 and 6970).

Forceware has had pre-built application profiles inside the control panel since, let's see.. 2003? Ish? CCC still doesn't have that.

Until AMD cards have the full functionality of Nvidia Inspector; AA bits, SLI bits, etc. in some form or other (RadeonPro doesn't even begin to come close) I won't even give them a look. You get what you pay for, at the end of the day. Not going to go bashing AMD owners but that's the way it is.


Having had nvidia and AMD GPU's for 20 years i have never once come across such an issue as refusing to run a 60Hz, ever.

Its also the first time i have ever seem anything like it being said.
 
That's impressive, considering GPUs have only been around for 13 years :p
24hz was forced at 1080p via HDMI in:

LA Noire, DX11
Crysis, DX10
Crysis 2, DX11
Gears of War, DX10
Resident Evil 5, DX10

There are others, but those are the ones I specifically remember.

The "GPU scaling" tickbox in CCC was supposed to fix the problem, but that functionality would work in one driver revision and be broken in the next. There were workarounds, but it was seriously annoying to have to deal with. In fact, the entire HDMI underscan/overscan slider was broken in certain driver revisions, with it resetting on a reboot.
 
AMD cards have better colour. I know it sounds strange but from someone thats gone back and forth allot its clear AMD have a better colour pallet and you cant change Nvidia's card settings to match without losing collaberation. AMD also have better picture quality and SSAA

Not that strange most people with experience of both notice that the colors on nVidia look a little desaturated whereas ATI/AMD have more a little more vibrant colors without becoming over-saturated.
 
It does now.

And thats the problem as people cling to the personal experience at the time and unaware of change and again generalising and keep thinking that there issue is also everyone else's, so they switch brands don't have as many issues personally and again apply that generally and that everyone on that brand must be having the same experience.

Personal experience can not be applied to the brand generally unless that's the general experience.
 
Last edited:
Be more patronising please. I still own the 5870 and 6970, thank you very much, and they still see regular use by my family.

The 24hz/50hz bug is totally reproducible, and seems to still be happening in the latest driver releases, judging by the number of threads popping up over the internet. And no, it's not just Crysis.

It does now.

It does? My CCC (12.6) doesn't include a list of games for which you can edit AA, AF, Vsync, Transparency AA, etc. You can add executables, and customise the settings for them, sure, but the functionality is half-baked at best compared to the competition. If they have added it, great. It's only the best part of a decade too late. Perhaps by 2020 there'll be an equivalent to Nvidia Inspector.
 
Last edited:
Be more patronising please. I still own the 5870 and 6970, thank you very much, and they still see regular use by my family.

The 24hz/50hz bug is totally reproducible, and seems to still be happening in the latest driver releases, judging by the number of threads popping up over the internet. And no, it's not just Crysis.

There is nothing patronising about my post and your reply is reinforcing what i have just said.

If they all have there PCs hocked up to multi brands of HD TV and they are all exhibiting the issue then that's another thing.
Both AMD and NV have compatibility issues with some HD TVs.
 
It does? My CCC (12.6) doesn't include a list of games for which you can edit AA, AF, Vsync, Transparency AA, etc. You can add executables, and customise the settings for them, sure, but the functionality is half-baked at best compared to the competition. If they have added it, great. It's only the best part of a decade too late. Perhaps by 2020 there'll be an equivalent to Nvidia Inspector.

Which is a 3rd party App, just like Radeonpro.

And as far as CCC goes it does include a list of games for which you can edit AA, AF, Vsync, Transparency AA, etc and you can add it for games not in the profile list.
 
Last edited:
Both.

http://www.mycrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=32846

http://www.mycrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=33374

http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1955171

Can just google it if you want, it's a problem with the DX10/11 API, happens to both manufacturers' cards. The reasons I chose this issue to highlight the disparity in quality between camps' drivers are 1) The effect on gameplay is huge, 2) AMD have failed to consistently (not consistently failed - it worked in one or two beta driver sets) fix it.

Which is a 3rd party App, just like Radeonpro.

Yes, it is. Except Nvidia Inspector is just displaying hidden advanced settings within Nvidia drivers, rather than adding an entirely new functionality to them, which is why no service or exe needs to be running in the background.
 
Last edited:
Both.

http://www.mycrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=32846

http://www.mycrysis.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=33374

http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1955171

Can just google it if you want, it's a problem with the DX10/11 API, happens to both manufacturers' cards. The reasons I chose this issue to highlight the disparity in quality between camps' drivers are 1) The effect on gameplay is huge, 2) AMD have failed to consistently (not consistently failed - it worked in one or two beta driver sets) fix it.



Yes, it is. Except Nvidia Inspector is just displaying hidden advanced settings within Nvidia drivers, rather than adding an entirely new functionality to them, which is why no service or exe needs to be run in the background.

Well you have highlighted that issue and as you said on both brands but the same can be said for issues that NV have that they still have not fixed but are not an issue for AMD. its just all down to the individual as to which issue is more of a problem for them personally.
We could both go on indefinitely highlighting specific brand issues and claim this is the more damning based on personal preference.
I personally have not had that issue in that game.

Ya, looks like AMD fixed their awful performance. Their driver team has been pulling wonders off this generation, reclaiming Dirt 3, Skyrim, Batman AC and clawing back most of the performance nV had in Crysis 2 / BF3. At the same time NV hasn't done anything to fix Anno 2070, Bulletstorm, Serious Sam 3, Alan Wake, Metro 2033, Sniper Elite, Dirt Showdown. Gotta give credit to AMD's driver team as being the leading team this year imo. They are fixing everything under the sun.

I already replied to you in the other thread regarding this. Really, so is that way GTX680 loses badly in these games:

- Alan Wake
- Anno 2070
- BulletStorm
- Serious Sam 3
- SKYIM with mods
- Arma II
- Sniper Elite V2
- Dirt Showdown
- Metro 2033

How come HD7950 is as fast as GTX680 and HD7870 trades blows with the 60 in Nexuiz built on CryEngine 3? That had nothing to do with AMD's developer relations?
You can't really have a situation where you claim that AMD has poor developer relations and poor drivers and yet it is NV who currently has massive holes in performance in a lot of games and hasn't fixed any of them. Contrary to this, AMD has actually fixed Batman AC, BF3, SKYRIM, Dirt 3.

Unlike some of you people, I'm not blind and biased to clear facts. If it was like Intel/AMD, where Intel is clearly the better choice, then maybe I'd be as biased as some of you guys. It's too bad AMD is the fastest card available though, isn't it? That's why I have one of their cards, and threw my 680 in my sons machine.

__________________
2600K -- Asus P8Z68-V -- Visiontek 7970 -- 8GB Samsung -- M4 256GB/Caviar Black 1TB -- XFX Core Pro 850W -- NZXT Switch 810 -- Full custom water loop

2600K -- MSI P67A-G43 -- Gigabtye GTX 680 -- 8GB Corsair Vengeance -- M4 64GB/Caviar Black 1TB -- Corsair HX650 -- HAF 922 (kiddo's machine)

http://forums.anandtech.com/forumdisplay.php?f=8

I'm in the same boat as the OP..

after the 6800GT and 7800GT's in SLI and the headache (mainly the need to go beta drivers for anything)

i decided to go fastest single card and that started with the X1900XTX it was such a great experience that i've stuck with them ever since with the 4850 4870, 5770, 5870 (eyefinity), and a 6750 in there too and i actually prefer ATI/AMD's drivers over Nvidia..

AMD still does push out a poor driver every now and then, but when you get a good one, it's really good. I'm using 12.3, and it's solid as a rock. (2012.March, loosely)

I've had poor luck with nVidia-drivers, they always crash at least once per day. I'm probably in the minority with this, but I've had far worse luck with nVidia-drivers than AMD ones. nVidias advantage in games optimising for them will likely win me back next time I upgrade, if their GPGPU gets better, and they release cards with larger membus again.

After my last Nvidia card fried due to the awsome "new" driver that put a pause to the card fan.. i went amd and 3 years later i dont regret for a second doing so.
"Bad amd drivers" is just a myth.

I'm one of those bad experience with Nvidia guys, been usin Radeons past few years with no issues.

I have a media PC running two 5770's in SLI (its a frankenstein) and my primary runs a 580, my GF runs a 560 ti 448, and I've owned many ATIs and nVidias throughout the years.

The driver issue is really a non-issue. Both series have their ups and downs, though nVIDIAs FWIW tend to have better optimization...

...that said, I have to downclock my card to run BF3 because that game xxxxxx HATES the 500 series.

I've actually had more drive issues with Nvidia, one of which was preventing me from upgrading the driver. I managed to fix it after like 5-6 complete install/uninstalls of the previous driver. There were also fan control problems and other stuff.
The worst driver problem I've had with AMD was random blue screens with a new version of the driver, which I fixed in like 5 minutes by getting back on the old driver.

Both companies have their bad drivers, not every one of them is going to be as good, and it doesn't always mean you should use the most up to date one either.

Based on personal experience from using both GPUs for the past 8 years, you just need to be wise about it. What do I mean about that may you ask? If you're willing to do it, that would mean using the most favored and stable drivers, whilst still ensuring they are relatively new. A good source of information for gathering such information from users' drivers experience would include overclock.net and guru3d.com.

On the whole though, you just gotta be smart about it, and remember, the newest driver to date doesn't always necessarily mean it is a must-have for everyone.

I never had problems with AMD drivers. My brother has an Nvidia card, and he's constantly facing some issues, such as flash player errors, driver has stopped working and some other weird things.

I'll chime in with my experience as well.

Cards I've owned:

GeForce 3
GeForce 6800
2x GeForce GTX 8800 ultra (woo, I had no expenses then!)
GTX 460

Radeon 4850
Radeon 5670
Radeon 6790
Radeon 6770


The -only- issues I've ever had with drivers were with the 460 and PSODs. The -only- issues I've had with faulty cards were with the 6790 (it was just poorly designed by the card maker).

http://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/1154555-AMD-ATI-drivers-VS-nvidia-drivers


Nvidia Inspector, CCC, Radeonpro: I don't think most people care of how its done under the hood as long as it works.

I'm not trying to claim one brand is better than the other, its just personal experience can mean that one is better for that individual based on there own experience and timing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom