• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Nvidia preparing new Geforce with GK110

was going to get an Asus 39inch 4K monitor anyway, hopefully this is the reason it's been delayed in to early next year
though they are talking about 144hz monitors, so maybe not
 
MyBrains said:
I'll stick with AMD as i dont have all those problems that Nvidia seems to be talking about.
Click to expand...

You don't have tearing with vsync off in any game?

Nice, maybe just give your setup to nvidia then, obviously all this research and new technology isn't needed.

What a stupid comment.
 
Suarez7 said:
You don't have tearing with vsync off in any game?

Nice, maybe just give your setup to nvidia then, obviously all this research and new technology isn't needed.

What a stupid comment.
Click to expand...

I don't personally game with V-sync off because tearing is horrendous.

But I don't notice lag and stutter with V-sync on either?!
 
Suarez7 said:
You don't have tearing with vsync off in any game?

Nice, maybe just give your setup to nvidia then, obviously all this research and new technology isn't needed.

What a stupid comment.
Click to expand...

Last time i had tearing that bad was on my old 6870. It aint a stupid comment im just being honest. Anyway vsync works well for me anyway so i guess its an Nvidia problem. My 7950 runs great without tearing. I guess u missed my BF4 Beta videos huh?
 
Actually you don't always get screen tear without vsync. It seems to depend on the game played. At least that's what ive found.

The thing that i picked up is they say reduced input lag, indicating it will still be present. You can achieve the same thing with vsync by limiting the fps to 1 below the monitors refresh rate.
 
VincentHanna said:
I don't personally game with V-sync off because tearing is horrendous.

But I don't notice lag and stutter with V-sync on either?!
Click to expand...

As said above it's because you're used to it, V-SYNC always has and always will induce input lag.

LtMatt said:
The thing that i picked up is they say reduced input lag, indicating it will still be present. You can achieve the same thing with vsync by limiting the fps to 1 below the monitors refresh rate.
Click to expand...

LMAO, you think something like this can be done that easily. nvidia wouldn't of spent that much time on it if it was a simple fix.
 
Again much like 4K seeing is believing. Will just have to see what the journos come back with.

Suarez7 said:
LMAO, you think something like this can be done that easily. nvidia wouldn't of spent that much time on it if it was a simple fix.
Click to expand...



Actually it can to a degree but it's more of a remedy rather than a fix. I think the proof will be in the pudding seeing this in motion. Much like the 120Hz debate
 
Last edited:
Suarez7 said:
LMAO, you think something like this can be done that easily. nvidia wouldn't of spent that much time on it if it was a simple fix.
Click to expand...

Its going to have the same effect. Otherwise they would've said input lag eliminated. Limit the fps to 1 below the refresh rate has exactly the same effect. It reduces input lag. What other benefit does this offer?
 
LtMatt said:
Its going to have the same effect. Otherwise they would've said input lag eliminated. Limit the fps to 1 below the refresh rate has exactly the same effect. It reduces input lag. What other benefit does this offer?
Click to expand...

Yeah it obviously has the same effect Matt, they spent years researching something that could be controlled by a simple software fix.

OCUK experts outwitting those nvidia engineers again.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom