OCZ Vertex 2 Pro fastest MLC drive...

Interesting stuff, good competitor to the x25-m's and buries the original Vertex.

There is the caviat that write speeds on compressed files are only actually in the 140MB/s range, but that's plenty.
 
It's likely knowing OCZ that these will be a while anyway so the Intel is still a good move in the meantime.

SSD technology is advancing so fast that you will never be able to keep up.
 
Grr damn new drives just when I had decided on an intel!

The article is based on a pre-production model. No dates or prices are given although it is hinted that these will be more expensive than the Intel models, and unlikely to ship for 2-3 months (to which you might need to add a month or two before it is generally available in the UK). If you are willing to wait 3-4 months for the Vertex Pro 2 to ship, you might as well wait a further 3-4 months for the Intel Generation 3 SSDs, but then having waited 8 months why not wait to see what 2011 brings ;-)

With SSDs there is also a good argument for not jumping onto the latest and greatest. All SSDs have had some share of firmware teething problems, not least of all the Intel G2s. Hopefully, most of the problems on the Intel have been ironed out. The new Vertex 2 Pro firmware is doing a lot more with your data (effectively some form of compression) and hence there is a lot more to go wrong. They may get it right first time, but it is probably safer to let others find that out.

Matthew
 
I find it strange that they claim it as the fastest drive they've ever tested, when in any real use benchmarks, IE I/O monitor tests where they actually replicate real world use, its just the same as the other drives.

ONLY the last 3 tests they did are based on real world use monitored and replicated by them with various apps, pcmark doesn't do that, its one companies idea of performance, and can really be twisted how they want, we really have no idea how accurate it is, even then it doesn't win every test.

Either way, the last 3 tests, it loses two far far more significantly than it wins the last one.

Yet again you'd see NO difference between any of those top drives in any situation. How often do we write 2mb sequential files, ok, copying photo's from one place to another in large quantities, then again, who stores gigs and gigs of photo's on an SSD, no one.

So basically, despite their claims, their real world tests show its slower. The model they tested ISN'T a cheaper drive, but a enterprise edition that will cost most likely quite a bit more than anything available, and its marginally faster at best in a single situation, slower in real world, slower in random 4kb read while only marginally faster in 4kb write.

So more money, for overall less performance in the two situations you'd use an enterprised priced drive(their heavy workload and less so their light workload test). Who would buy an enterprise SSD for 1/8th of an FPS more at twice the price maybe?

I really do find it strange they can claim is easily the fastest when their own tests say otherwise.

Yet again we see that benchmarks, and winning ONE specific performance area, means nothing in the real world where you need performance all over the place.

Likewise real world performance is basically undetectable between a Intel and a crucial right now.

As for SSD's, I don't get the constant need to use the latest firmware, I've experienced no noticeable performance loss anywhere on my ssd's, even if a benchmark tries to convince me otherwise. I'll drop in the garbage collection firmware when its finally available and working without bugs, and I really couldn't care less when that is.
 
As for SSD's, I don't get the constant need to use the latest firmware, I've experienced no noticeable performance loss anywhere on my ssd's, even if a benchmark tries to convince me otherwise. I'll drop in the garbage collection firmware when its finally available and working without bugs, and I really couldn't care less when that is.

I disagree here. Many manufacturers have added TRIM functionality to their drives which stops the drive fragmenting in such a way that it slows down after time. Also significant performance gains can be seen in some firmware
updates.

However, I agree there would be little real world increase for the average home user. To contradict myself, many SSD's that have suffered as a result of ageing are still a lot faster than many HDDs and more than acceptable in any real world situation.
 
Early Adopting SSDs

I am an early adopter of the OCZ Vertex drives.
I have 3x30gb running in Raid 0 connected to an Adaptec 2405 controller.

They are fast, but they issues with firmware and updates and slowdown is very real. YOu have to be committed to updating and fiddling with your system if you want to use this technogoloy now.

I bought my kit when it was released last year in February before we knew which raid contollers to go for. The general consensus is that the Adaptec doesn't cope well and LSI is better.

With the latest fw update of the drive and Adaptec controller my system is now very unstable.

I've decided to buy 3x 1TB Samsung F3 drives to run on the adaptec and will use the ssd's purely for a high speed onboard raid area for gaming.

Having said all of that - I have a Vertex 120GB in my Dell XPS 1730 which I haven't fiddled with at all (running on oen of the intial firmwares) and it's performed very well and still boots super fast into Windows 7!

Will be very interested to do first hand testing to see the 'real world' difference between the Vertex and Samsung F3.

I'd be willing to upgrade SSD after probably generation 3 or 4 - I won't bet trying Vertex 2...
 
add my 2p to this thread
I also was an early adopter with the 60GB Vertex and upgraded to it from a 2nd generation Raptor as my boot drive

the difference at opening programs such as Photoshop was quite eye opening... and was really well pleased with the Vertex

a week or so before xmas the Vertex started giving me problems so I sent it back for the OCZ guys to have a look at, and I bought a Samsung F3 and am currently using it as a boot drive and must say its a fast drive.. I was pretty surprized at just how fast it is giving far better benchmarks than my 74gb 2nd generation Raptor does

but it still cannot live with the Vertex at opening up programs... it pretty much rips open programs - so am looking forward to getting my drive back... and no doubt that this new Vertex 2 will be pretty awesome
my 2p
 
Lets hope by Q4 these things will be priced more realistically.

Yes and I also just bought a G2 Intel, as I also think its the best atm.
 
I upgraded from a 74 gig first generation WD Raptor to a 120g Vertex and have found it pretty awesome tbh, easy to tuck away anywhere in the case, cool, completely silent (the noise the raptor made was borderline unbearable), plus the speed benefits of course.
 
Back
Top Bottom