OCZ Vertex 2E or Intel X25-M?

I don't think there's much between them in real world usage. They are both drives on the fast end of the spectrum, and what differences you may get will be marginal.

Then it comes down to price an reliability. I don't think there's much in that either, so it leaves prices, and the OCZ is just way cheaper and a good buy.

The 120GB version is now over £200. Not so good, when you can get two 60GB for cheaper and faster (if you go RAID 0).
 
Also if I buy either of Crucial RealSSD C300 128GB compare with the OCZ Vertex 2E 120G do they come with an adapter to fit in a 3.5" drive bay? or can someone point me at that product
 
Also if I buy either of Crucial RealSSD C300 128GB compare with the OCZ Vertex 2E 120G do they come with an adapter to fit in a 3.5" drive bay? or can someone point me at that product

Dunno about the Crucial but the OCZ comes with a 2.5" to 3.5" adapter.

That's the way I read the info on that link.

My SATA is in IDE mode. If I now changed it to ACHI will everything boot as normal, all things being equal?

Yes but you need to change a registry setting first, otherwise you'll get a BSOD. Google it.
 
Ive currently the intel x25m, although I dont regret it, im yet to decide if to purchase the new Vertex 2E, main thing is am concerned with is, is the Vertex 2E 4K Read/Writes a lot faster than the intel x25m?

I just got a 90GB Vetex 2E and Ive just found out,, that sandforce controller compresses all of its data before it reads so it can achieve 250+mb's speeds. So this means the data it cant compress you'll only get about 150mb/s speeds. I dont think intel ssd's needs to compress data to achieve fast read speeds

This guy says over at OCZ............

Sandforce drives are rated among the fastest OS drives on the market across the net. Despite the fact that this controller writes incompressible data more slowly, it's all in the "average" time spent using the drive through the entire session. In other words, you don't write incompressible data to the drive constantly anyways, and will only see smaller losses in the average when that is done. If it's OS/apps/games buy Sandforce. Storage(who really does this with SSD yet, right?) will favor another controller type if the data in already highly compressed/incompressible(vid,pics,music,etc).

I've tried a few different controllers(close to 50 drives) and the Sandforce is the best. This is said despite the fact that my old Indilinx array actually wrote around 100MB/s quicker with incompressible data. Even considering that into the equation I still save about 10-15% more time with this array. Multi-tasking ability is much better with this controller as a result of the phemonial small file performance and high IOP's.

Should be noted that I'm no fanboy though and eagerly await the competitors next gen drives due out this spring. IMHO, Sandforce will pay the price for previous debauchery. We'll see who gets my cash then and it will surely go to the highest bidder.
 
winexp.png


Heres mine.
 
Cheers for the info. That's simple enough and shall do it tomorrow after work.

Just did the regedit and BIOS setting change and the bloody PC tried to catch me out. Wouldn't boot up so I went into the boot priority and couldn't select a HDD so I went into the HDD settings and my external USB drive was the first HDD boot priority. Changed it to my boot drive and all is now well.

Bloody computers :D
 
BENCHMARKS!!!

Hi again all,

I received my SSD today and installed it and have done a clean re-install of Win7 64-bit onto the new drive.

Did all the usual, updates, activation, drivers, etc and ran some benchmarks.

Behold:

capture8ssdafterupdates.jpg

capture9ssdafterupdates.jpg

Note: CPU is running at stock to make sure no issues arise, just paranoia. :)
 
Im glad its working as it should "plonka2000";)

I started to use shutdown again when I got my ssd, as a hdd would annoy me, cos it would spend about 2mins caching progs into the mem when windows had booted. With the ssd you dont notice windows doing the caching stuff as the drive is silent and loads everything instantly as soon as windows has booted.

But now Ive gone back to using sleep as I have found out sleep and shutdown both use 2-3watts. Yeah ssd's are damn fast but still not as fast as the comp coming out of sleep, cos your cutting out the bios/checking screens and booting windows. So sleep takes about 3secs to resume windows and todo a full boot takes about 15-20secs, so theirs no contest really is there?
 
Got my bigfoot ssd yesterday. Silly DPD delivery cant be bothered to press the buzzer for me to come pick the package up since he didnt wanna bother to go up the flat, had to go pick it up from the depot only to find out the same driver forgot to unload my package and went off on collections lol so had to wait another hour. Guess I cant moan much twas free shipping but feels quite crappy lol.

Anywho below are ATTO and WEI after what I think was a correct installation.

ssdpowah.jpg


weix.jpg
 
I have both the Intel X25-M 80GB & OCZ Vertex 2E 120 GB. Real world speed I found to be very close its almost impossible to tell. Benchmarks are similar but this does not translate to much noticeable difference.

For PC gaming though neither is that much faster than traditional 7.2K HD's as most PC games contain large data files which SSD's do not handle any better than mechanical HD's.

The OCZ feels slightly quicker due to the Sandforce controller but there is not a huge amount of different between the 2. For gaming still buy raid 1Tb + HD's preferably with 64MB Cache. The only exception to this is PC games which have lots of smaller files but most you will find have mainly large data files so SSD's work best on OS & applications.

OCZ IBIS is probably the best choice but the price is ridiculous right now it needs to drop 50% before its viable.
 
I don't really see why someone who primarily uses their PC for gaming would be interested in an SSD in the first place. For the money you could get a second high-end video card and get a much better boost to your gaming experience than an SSD would offer, surely?
 
Back
Top Bottom