• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**Official Unigine Valley Leaderboard**

Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2003
Posts
13,447
Location
South Derbyshire
My single run

GPU @ 1340mhz, memory @ 1800mhz
CPU 3930k @ 4700mhz

00021k.png
 
Soldato
Joined
3 Jun 2012
Posts
10,869
My card cant stay stable at 1250 :(

And they sold the DCII as extreme overclockers :( all that power delivery but with a crappy core lol

The memory stays stable up to 1900mhz!
 
OcUK Staff
Joined
20 Feb 2012
Posts
10,176
Location
John Smiths Stadium
I can see 8 Pack doubling OCUKs electricity bill trying to beat this.:D

Nice run

I cant bench at OCUK. But I will just run the card 1525/1825 at weekend.

Although I am not saying Locky is using tweaked driver settings I beleive the score is inflated in some way. Tessalation disabled or not by application. 6.1ghz CPU with 2600 RAM vs whatever Locky is running. HT is not beneficial in this bench but RAW CPU speed is. Then 1500 mhz Core vs 1340 is a massive winner with GPU RAM speed being important but not anywhere near as much as core. I am at BLK 107 too so again higher than Locky.

Its a great score for those hardware settings and well done to Locky for his efficiency but either the driver settings are tweaked or the bench its self is slightly a miss. Which this could be the case too on rev 1.0.

EDIT: Thanks for your input Matt. I think the Bench is dodgy then to be honest. Great Locky.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Oct 2003
Posts
13,447
Location
South Derbyshire
I never cheat 8pack, you need to take a look at your own tests before commenting on mine, sore loser tbh.

You should be trouncing us here, but most people are close to you with lower clocks and I beat you with much lower clocks.
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
40,736
Location
United Kingdom
My single run

GPU @ 1340mhz, memory @ 1800mhz
CPU 3930k @ 4700mhz

00021k.png

Hmm actually Locky im falling just short of your score. 2342 is the best ive managed so far.

I cant bench at OCUK. But I will just run the card 1525/1825 at weekend.

Although I am not saying Locky is using tweaked driver settings I beleive the score is inflated in some way. Tessalation disabled or not by application. 6.1ghz CPU with 2600 RAM vs whatever Locky is running. HT is not beneficial in this bench but RAW CPU speed is. Then 1500 mhz Core vs 1340 is a massive winner with GPU RAM speed being important but not anywhere near as much as core. I am at BLK 107 too so again higher than Locky.

Its a great score for those hardware settings and well done to Locky for his efficiency but either the driver settings are tweaked or the bench its self is slightly a miss. Which this could be the case too on rev 1.0.

EDIT: Thanks for your input Matt. I think the Bench is dodgy then to be honest. Great Locky.

Locky's score is legit. I fell 1 point shy of his total with 5mhz less on the core. I'm giving up for now so well done Locky, great score.

i7 2700k @4.5ghz
7970 @1335/1875

T4mPK8j.jpg
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
21 May 2012
Posts
31,940
Location
Dalek flagship
I cant bench at OCUK. But I will just run the card 1525/1825 at weekend.

Although I am not saying Locky is using tweaked driver settings I beleive the score is inflated in some way. Tessalation disabled or not by application. 6.1ghz CPU with 2600 RAM vs whatever Locky is running. HT is not beneficial in this bench but RAW CPU speed is. Then 1500 mhz Core vs 1340 is a massive winner with GPU RAM speed being important but not anywhere near as much as core. I am at BLK 107 too so again higher than Locky.

Its a great score for those hardware settings and well done to Locky for his efficiency but either the driver settings are tweaked or the bench its self is slightly a miss. Which this could be the case too on rev 1.0.

EDIT: Thanks for your input Matt. I think the Bench is dodgy then to be honest. Great Locky.

I think the latest drivers have made quite a difference on this bench, some of the scores have increased quite a bit in the last 24 hours.
 
Associate
Joined
29 Apr 2003
Posts
1,102
Location
London
8Packs scores were with Beta 5? where as Locky and Ltmatt are using the newer tweaked beta 6 driver which added around 10% performance increase- so I see nothing wrong with Locky's score. When 8pack runs his card suing the beta 6 driver, its "game over please insert some more coins time".

However take a look at my 7950 at 1340/1890 vs Stonersdudes 7970 1330/1900 (2266 vs 2268) and the scores are neck and neck, from the outside it looks like I'm cheating but I'm actually not, I have all driver settings on default apart from triple buffer, no other third part app (radeonpro or mvp), apart from MSI AB.

**edit my original scores were 2050 beta 5 (1300/1900) to 2268 beta 6 however on (1340/1890) nice increase

Btw nice scores peeps
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
21 May 2012
Posts
31,940
Location
Dalek flagship
8Packs scores were with Beta 5? where as Locky and Ltmatt are using the newer tweaked beta 6 driver which added around 10% performance increase I see nothing wrong with Locky's score. When 8pack runs his card suing the beta 6 driver, its "game over please insert some more coins time".

However take a look at my 7950 at 1340/1900 vs Stonersdudes 7970 1330/1900 (2266 vs 2268) and the scores are neck and neck, from the outside it looks like I'm cheating but I'm actually not, I have all driver settings on default apart from triple buffer, no other third part app (radeonpro or mvp), apart from MSI AB.

Btw nice scores peeps

+1
 
Back
Top Bottom