Jokester said:So you believe we shouldn't take basic health and safety precautions at work becuase we all have a choice not to do that job?
Jokester
Of course not.
Jokester said:So you believe we shouldn't take basic health and safety precautions at work becuase we all have a choice not to do that job?
Jokester
VeNT said:exactly,
firefighters shouldn't be protected from fires (with equipment etc) because ITS THEIR CHOISE TO DO THAT JOB!
james.miller said:and so much for keeping it on topic. who'd have thought it would degenerate into "omg smoking kills" rant?
tenchi-fan said:Worthy, are you trolling or are you naturally thick? Millions of people don't die each year from drinking orange juice.
sorry I forgot my sarcasam tagsballistic said:what a strange argument.
so you don't want to protect worker's health, but rather make it part of their contract that they will likely get lung cancer?
To be fair drinking alcohol will cause most of those (and some to a greater extent).ballistic said:I rather smell sweat that passively smoke that crap which gives you lung cancer, destroys your teeth, makes you sterile, gives you heart disease, gives you emphysema, gives you bronchitis , gives you mouth cancer, harms pregnancy, promotes osteoporosis, causes aging of skin and causes strokes.
Do you prefer to smell sweat or get cancer?
Because it's a completely different kettle of fish to workers smoking in their workplace, this is a customer (who is paying to be there, rather than being paid, lets not forget).JRS said:What I do have a problem with is people smoking in a workplace. A bar/pub/club is just that, which is why the ban is being brought in under 'health in the workplace' laws. And for the life of me I can't figure out why many people don't understand this....
Not really passive smoking. It replaces the oxygenWorthy said:Oh get over yourself. You can't seriously believe that passive smoke from going to a club once or twice a week will give you cancer?
j00ni said:Because it's a completely different kettle of fish to workers smoking in their workplace, this is a customer (who is paying to be there, rather than being paid, lets not forget).
If you take a job in an office it is reasonable to expect that the environment in which you work will not be full of smoke. You cannot say the same when taking on bar work.
Next they will be banning alcohol from clubs because there is a danger to staff and other punters that they could be assaulted by a drunk person.
Maybe i didn't quite make my point clear, I realise that smoking in the office was common not so long since. What I was getting at is that smoking is a leisure activity, and so it is reasonable to expect that it will not be occurring in a professional white collar workplace. However, the same cannot be said of someone working in the entertainment/leisure industry (to an extent)Jokester said:Smoking in offices was common once Jooni, but guess what, employers were required to do workplace risk assessments which found that it was an acceptable risk to other staff to be exposed to passive smoking.
And assualt is already illegal .
Jokester
tenchi-fan said:They are just harming themselves. Smoking harms everyone, and in nightclubs this could include staff, non-smokers and pregnant women.
It probably wouldn't be all that noticable in the first trimester (which incidentally is when the most harm can be done) - and it is possible the mother herself doesn't realiseFox said:I have to say I have yet to see a pregnant woman in a nightclub. Having said that if these women do indeed venture into a nightclub its their problem not the smokers.
j00ni said:What I was getting at is that smoking is a leisure activity, and so it is reasonable to expect that it will not be occurring in a professional white collar workplace. However, the same cannot be said of someone working in the entertainment/leisure industry (to an extent)