As someone mentioned above i watched about 10mins of QT last night and was absolutely... well shocked/confused how people were defending bin Laden and treating him as though he had been the victim of a firing squad?
What also amazed me is that Paddy Ashdown (a man who should be no stranger to Terrorism or genocidal maniacs) to say that bin Laden should have stood trial? What?, because of people like him a man responsible for 10's of thousands of deaths got away without a guilty verdict... because he seems to be unrepenting that law is his "highest order?" the same "law" that doesn't even look to accommodate instances such as these. If bin Laden did get taken in to face trial this would take decades, cost $billions.
You also had that Asian lady saying it was wrong of the Americans to shoot an unarmed man... i'm sorry but 3,500+ unarmed people on 9/11 and 7/7 didn't get that same courtesy. She also started bleating on about an independant investigation. If you want an investigation, by all means carry one out, but it will not in any way be funded by tax payers, if her chums at HRW and Amnesty want an investigation, use their own funds to give them their "moral crusade" against common sense.
Douglas Manning (iirc) has always got a generally correct view on anything like this that is this controversial. He summed it up in the most sensible way "I'm glad that he's gone". And equally so i felt that the Transport Minister kept himself fairly neutral in that opinion didn't come through much.
Is it me or does the public want bin Laden still to be alive?
I will be watching the rest of the programme tonight on iPlayer and no doubt it doesn't get any better.
One final note: typical of the British "high society" to eagerly defend bin Laden!
What also amazed me is that Paddy Ashdown (a man who should be no stranger to Terrorism or genocidal maniacs) to say that bin Laden should have stood trial? What?, because of people like him a man responsible for 10's of thousands of deaths got away without a guilty verdict... because he seems to be unrepenting that law is his "highest order?" the same "law" that doesn't even look to accommodate instances such as these. If bin Laden did get taken in to face trial this would take decades, cost $billions.
You also had that Asian lady saying it was wrong of the Americans to shoot an unarmed man... i'm sorry but 3,500+ unarmed people on 9/11 and 7/7 didn't get that same courtesy. She also started bleating on about an independant investigation. If you want an investigation, by all means carry one out, but it will not in any way be funded by tax payers, if her chums at HRW and Amnesty want an investigation, use their own funds to give them their "moral crusade" against common sense.
Douglas Manning (iirc) has always got a generally correct view on anything like this that is this controversial. He summed it up in the most sensible way "I'm glad that he's gone". And equally so i felt that the Transport Minister kept himself fairly neutral in that opinion didn't come through much.
Is it me or does the public want bin Laden still to be alive?
I will be watching the rest of the programme tonight on iPlayer and no doubt it doesn't get any better.
One final note: typical of the British "high society" to eagerly defend bin Laden!




