I commented on the report, and the family voting mentioned it. I said that it doesn't state who was doing it (and I pointed to Brexiteers who'd stated proudly that they knew their whole family had voted for the BXP). To which you replied "you miss the point being made in the article about family voting". And you go on to "explain" that it's all about "some cultures". Since then you've conceded that the point I missed "being made in the article" isn't in the article. And on the racism point, I'm saying there's nothing in the report to support your allegation the family voting was limited to "some cultures" and that being married to someone from an ethnic minority isn't proof someone is not racist. SC is better than GD in that it's less frequent that you need to explain the same points so many times.