Pick my dad a car...

Personally I would only ever go Jap or German when I buy a car nowadays.

Mates fiesta: 91k miles, 3rd engine.

Another mate's bro's M reg Golf GTi 2.0: 251k miles, 1st engine, 1st gearbox :D

rest my case.
 
Were there any special adaptions to the cars, or were they bog standard?

tbh, I'd just stick with the motability cars. £45 a week aint much if it includes all the maintenance, insurance etc, plus when you think you're getting in a brand new car.

You'd loose more than that in depreciation.
 
I'd agree with Bug, £45 a week including everything bar petrol sounds like a good deal. An astra isn't the most exciting thing but it'll certainly do the job for him I'm sure.
 
csd said:
Way too big. Astra sized idealy.

Way to big, it's only slightly bigger than an Astra :rolleyes: It's not exactly a huge car.

At £45 a week for absolutely everything he'd be better off sticking with Motability.
 
Motability cars are extremely good value for money if you choose carefully. A new car, fully maintained, insured, taxed and a with guaranteed replacement vehicle when yours is off the road is good value at £45 a week.

Yes, you can run an older car for less than £45 a week but if you're spending 4k on the car, £300 a year on insurance and say £200 a year to cover maintenance/tyres/MOT, your total outlay over 3 years is £5500. If you get £2k back for the car you've spent £3500 or near as damn it £100 a month. The £4k in the bank will earn you £20 a month in interest, so you're only an insurance claim or expensive repair away each year from being out of pocket and stuck with an older car.

I can understand opting out if you want something a bit off the wall or an older prestige car or something, but for a bog standard hatch I'd say the benefits of the scheme outweigh the costs.

Isn't this a bit academic right now though, as the car won't go back until March 08 at the earliest?
 
As others have recommended, £45 all in sounds a pretty good deal to be honest.

Just as a side issue/question. is this the same for all disabled drivers, not having to pay tax. If so, could someone please explain to me why they don't; Surely they can use the roads just as much as an "more abled" person can?! :confused:

thanks

Greg
 
Back
Top Bottom