Polar bear vs. Tiger

Samtheman1k · 8 May 2007 at 11:34

Who (and why) would win in a fight?

Mobius 1 · 8 May 2007 at 11:35

Um...why would you want to pit these two animals together in the first place? :confused:

SunaseIPs · 8 May 2007 at 11:37

If Polar Bear in snowy environment then Polar Bear as he could hide.
If Polar Bear in indian jungles then he would stick out and get owned.

Depends on setting tbh.

Ricochet J · 8 May 2007 at 11:37

Pfft. Tiger vs Lion is a better fight. But i'd say Polar Bear as it could drown the tiger any day.

malfunkshun · 8 May 2007 at 11:39

Polar bear, based sheer power, big claws and a hell of a bite force.

Mobius 1 · 8 May 2007 at 11:40

the reason for my first post being a polar bear wouldn't cope too well in jungle environemnt vice versa for the tiger in a freezing environtment. but the polar bear would win, as it is larger imo, although, the tiger could go for the throat and own the bear in one bite.

polar bear for the win.

Manlove is my forte · 8 May 2007 at 11:40

Polar bears rank with the Kodiak bear as among the largest living land carnivores, and male polar bears may weigh twice as much as a Siberian tiger. There is great sexual dimorphism, with some males reaching more than twice the size of the females. Most adult males weigh 300-600 kg (660-1320 lbs) and measure 2.4-3.0 m (7.9-10.0 ft) in length. Adult females are roughly half the size of males and normally weigh 150-300 kg (330-660 lbs), measuring 1.9-2.1 m (6.25-7 ft).[5][6] At birth, cubs weigh only 600-700 g or about a pound and a half.

Ah wikipedia is thete anything you don't know.

Twice the weight says Polar bear wins.

basmic · 8 May 2007 at 11:43

Google says tiger.

trojan698 · 8 May 2007 at 11:44

-Tauren- said:
Um...why would you want to pit these two animals together in the first place?

It's supposed to a bit of fun..

iCraig · 8 May 2007 at 11:44

I reckon the polar bear. Far stronger than the Tiger.

Mobius 1 · 8 May 2007 at 11:44

trojan698 said:
It's supposed to a bit of fun..

indeed

iCraig · 8 May 2007 at 11:46

Horse vs Giraffe?

squiffy · 8 May 2007 at 11:47

iCraig said:
Horse vs Giraffe?

Giraffe, easily. Hind legs would break the horses ribs and back.

Samtheman1k · 8 May 2007 at 11:49

Surely a Tiger is much more agile than a Polar bear and thus is more likely to get a deadly bite in, and at the same time being able to avoid the Polar bear's strikes?

dustiestrat · 8 May 2007 at 11:49

i reckon polar bears got this fight for sure just through size and power also reckon fur coat on it is probably so thick it'll shield a lot of damage done by the claws .

100 little monkeys vs a lion

iCraig · 8 May 2007 at 11:50

Unless the horse pivoted around and got a sharp double kick to its thin legs, bringing the giraffe down.

iCraig · 8 May 2007 at 11:51

Samtheman1k said:
Surely a Tiger is much more agile than a Polar bear and thus is more likely to get a deadly bite in, and at the same time being able to avoid the Polar bear's strikes?

It's fairly agile but the bear is no sloth either, I believe it can leap and run. Also I reckon the bear has got a layer of fat so tiger wounds may not do too much damage.

Calder · 8 May 2007 at 11:56

iCraig said:
Horse vs Giraffe?

Would spend years fannying around and missing each other, then get bored and walk off.

Mobius 1 · 8 May 2007 at 11:58

Calder said:
Would spend years fannying around and missing each other, then get bored and walk off.

i think a swift headbut from the horse would knock the giraffe on it ***. and then....um..oh wait.

CLAWS · 8 May 2007 at 12:01

Polar bear. Southpaws own all!!