Pole and line tuna - sustainable tuna, really?

Man of Honour
Man of Honour
Joined
3 May 2004
Posts
17,710
Location
Kapitalist Republik of Surrey
We had a talk on sustainable development and fisheries. Some of you may have seen the film The End of The Line which is a feature length documentary about the state of fisheries worldwide and paints a pretty bleak picture for the future of many species of fish due to overfishing. Many fish stocks are depleted to a level that they will never recover, cod being one of them, blue fin tuna being another and our talk was along the same lines.

There was a degree of ethics in the talk, so it was pointed out that not all fish was being fished unsustainably and while it would be advisable to avoid fish from certain sources it is fine from others. Pole and line caught skipjack tuna was noted as one that was sustainable.

I then noticed in Sainsburys that all their own brand tins of tuna now have this 'pole and line' branding on them. Immediately I was overcome with suspicion. I inherently don't trust supermarkets. I don't trust their marketing and I don't agree with their practices. It's a bit like because their Woodland eggs are Woodland brand eggs. They don't come from chickens that live in woodlands, they are just branded that way which I think is misleading. Same with their free range chickens, just because they meet some minimum basic requirement doesn't make them good. Same with M&S Oakham chickens. They aren't better because they are a different brand, they are still grade A battery chickens.

Rant aside, what's my point? I don't believe one bit that Sainsburys tuna is caught in a sustainable way and I certainly don't believe that each fish is caught with a hook and line. I think it's all a big marketing exercise and it's misleading.

But I have felt compelled to follow this up and I have looked around for more information and it appears I may be wrong. I don't usually use fundamentalist organisations for my research but Greenpeace may have provided the answer in the form of this pdf.

Page 3 points out that Sainsbury’s has already moved 90% of its canned tuna to pole and line caught methods, and plans to extend this to 100%

So I'll leave you to make your own minds up but I'm thinking I might be wrong here and that Sainsburys might have cleaned their act up.
 
I don't believe that any method of catching any fish from the sea is sustainable.
The demand for fish around the world is too great and the efficiency of the fishing fleets in finding and catching fish is absolutely scarey.
I've watched some of the programmes on the documentary channels about Australian boats hunting tuna. Those fish do not stand a chance and it can only be a matter of time before tuna and other highly profitable species like haddock and cod are pushed close to extinction.
Supermarkets, as you stated, use any ploy they can to get folk to buy and adding "line caught" or "sustainable" is very misleading. I watched a programme on Sky recently about Alaskan long line boats after halibut and cod. Their lines were 23km in length with a hook every 10m and they had 6 of these lines on board. No need to do the math, thats an awful lot of hooks. According to my memory that boat landed 53,000kg of fish in five days. How can a catch like that be classed as sustainable even though it is line caught ? And it was'nt the only boat in the fleet
 
Is there not ways companies can get around this, for example using really long lines with loads of hooks on them?

(sorry if the answer is mentioned in the .pdf, only had chance to skim it).
 
Who cares how the fish is caught? When you are pulling millions of tonnes of fish out of the sea every day, your chosen fishing method is not the problem. You still see the shelves in the supermarket stacked with just as many cans of tuna as before, so what's the difference?
 
paulwatson1.jpg


He will definitely have something to say.
 
Is there not ways companies can get around this, for example using really long lines with loads of hooks on them?

(sorry if the answer is mentioned in the .pdf, only had chance to skim it).
Indeed, this was one of the first things that came into my head 'I wonder how they are getting around this?'
 
its all rubbish

went to a lecture recently about wood burning power plants that are starting to pop up. they call the wood sustainable and the owners of them make HUGE amounts of cash selling carbon credits because apparently wood is carbon neutral

it might be sustainable at the moment but its not going to be sustainable when everyone's finished jumping on the bandwagon and all the forests start disapearing...

surely tuna is the same. after years of "pole and line tuna is great'' everyone has started doing and now theres concerns about the long term sustainability
 
Back
Top Bottom