Except that you poo poo'd the idea that they could be a king maker. Since we have a two party system in the uk and a lot of elections are finely balanced, they certainly can and probably have been king maker in quite a few elections.
But I do agree, they couldnt just pick a party like the Communist party and get them elected. It has to be somebody already in with a chance of winning.
Yes I think the Green's share of the vote would increase. No I do not think that the Green Party would win the general election just because the newspapers were telling people to vote Green. Difference between influence and deciding. Most papers in this country backed remain, including the Murdoch owned Times, the people decided for themselves.So lets say I own the majority of papers. I then trash the tories for the next 5 years (some true stories others not) whilst praising the green party. Then come election time I print a headline "enough is enough... vote green"
Do you think the greens vote share would increase?
Most papers in this country backed remain, including the Murdoch owned Times, the people decided for themselves.
Hmm so the Conservatives aren't committing to cutting immigration at all....and they certainly aren't costing it.
Because people have their fingers in their ears and don't want to hear it...Wow how has that video not been shared more. Considering the about of flack labour got for not costing theirs (they did ... Even if stupidly abitious) .... They havnt even done anything
Wow how has that video not been shared more. Considering the about of flack labour got for not costing theirs (they did ... Even if stupidly abitious) .... They havnt even done anything
Wow how has that video not been shared more. Considering the amount of flack labour got for not costing theirs (they did ... Even if stupidly abitious) .... They havnt even done anything
So the Conservative plan is uncosted but people are still lapping it up. Brilliant.
1. We had a referendum on voting reform in 2011, the people decided they preferred FPTP. I personally wanted to change to AV, but I accept the result of that referendum so we must stick with FPTP (I did point out at the time that voting for FPTP would mean no possibility of voting reform for a long, long time). Hey ho.Looking into the details of the Conservative manifesto, two things stand out:
1. A pledge to make all elections FPTP, including mayoral elections.
2. A pledge to bring in a requirement to show ID when voting in person.
The Conservatives are going to try their hardest to game the system in their favour. FTFP is a terrible and outdated voting system, prone to accusations of gerrymandering. Voter ID requirements have proven to lower voter numbers and have very, very little effect on voter fraud.
I did poo poo the idea that they are, not that they can't influence though...the Tories are very likely to win this election with a decent majority - I don't think the Sun would be able to stop them from winning.
Wow how has that video not been shared more. Considering the amount of flack labour got for not costing theirs (they did ... Even if stupidly abitious) .... They havnt even done anything
Hmm so the Conservatives aren't committing to cutting immigration at all....and they certainly aren't costing it.
We are all in this together and its "tough love" Don't forget May stated yesterday in here speech "If we dont get a deal from Brexit, this country will be financially ruined."
I expect many people have already made their minds up - personally I think the Tory manifesto is disappointing and isnt the best one out there that represents me
However.......
I dont see any credible party outside of the Tories that would make me put a tick in their box so whilst some of the stuff in there isnt great - I dont trust any of the others (better manifesto or not) to be competent enough to deliver theirs.
a bit of a rubbish situation to be in but not voting isnt an option
What makes Teresa May and the Tories so competent? What specifically have they done since July 2016 to convince you they are so much better than anyone else?
Did she actually say that? I'm shocked if she actually said that. I believe the statement is partially true to be honest... But then if it does financially ruin us then should we be really going ahead with it?
2. Surely tackling voting fraud is a good thing for government to be prioritising? We wouldn't want any external influence of our elections now would we?
Silly thing is they don't really have to exude confidence, the opposition is currently so bad/incompetent that any mediocre politicians are competent when running against Labour. The Tories could have chosen to put practically nothing in their manifesto, not taken controversial decisions re: social care etc.. and they'd still convincingly be better than Corbyn and chums...
Did she actually say that? I'm shocked if she actually said that. I believe the statement is partially true to be honest... But then if it does financially ruin us then should we be really going ahead with it?
Our future prosperity, our place in the world, our standard of living, and the opportunities we want for our children – and our children’s children – each and every one depends on having the strongest possible hand as we enter those negotiations in order to get the best Brexit deal for families across this country.
If we fail, the consequences for Britain and for the economic security of ordinary working people will be dire.
This is what she actually said:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...sequences-without-clean-brexit-warns-theresa/
Not Greebo's BS quote - more lies...