• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Single card that still has many of the same issues as any multi GPU setup.

Which was exactly my point on why people have bought the Titan X now or are waiting for the 390x.

If you're happy with the 295x2 then great but don't try and cover up the issues it does have by saying reviews must be wrong and the minimums are glitched. I could use that excuse for the maximums or averages as well if I wanted to be pedantic.
 
Single card that still has many of the same issues as any multi GPU setup.

Which was exactly my point on why people have bought the Titan X now or are waiting for the 390x.

If you're happy with the 295x2 then great but don't try and cover up the issues it does have by saying reviews must be wrong and the minimums are glitched. I could use that excuse for the maximums or averages as well if I wanted to be pedantic.



Take that up with the review sites that have greatly varying numbers in terms of framerates be it max min or average.
 
I have nothing to take up with them, they reflect my own findings in the games I saw the lower minimums in.

Perhaps you should get in touch with them and tell them their results are glitched.
 
But they've done well with their cards, they keep up with the much newer Nvidia cards and they are basically considered relics aren't they? :p

Just lower the settings and you'll see your minimums shoot right up!

Lighten up guys :D
 
I have nothing to take up with them, they reflect my own findings in the games I saw the lower minimums in.

Perhaps you should get in touch with them and tell them their results are glitched.

Can't half tell you've only been around here 5 minutes. Theres been plenty of discussion in the past about minimums in benchmarks and what was causing the issues. You can ramble on all you want but the fact remains that results vary greatly across sites even on similar hardware, but its quite obvious that you're happy to cherry pick the ones thats support your little argument, whereas i on the other hand, really couldn't give a ****. :)
 
You quite clearly do give a **** as you jumped to your cards defense straight away. Pretend you don't thought if that makes you feel better.

I've used both cards myself, I don't need to cherry pick anything.
 
How have you stated fact? All you've said is their results must be glitched.

Doesn't look like fact to me, looks like an assumption.

Is it really that hard to believe that in games that don't scale greatly, minimums won't be much better than a 290x?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom