Powerline adapters for gaming

Soldato
Joined
29 Dec 2002
Posts
7,251
Due to the way powerline works, it’s trial and error as it depends on your individual wiring, how good you are at following simple instructions and how lucky you are. All of those make ‘good’ a very subjective term. Are you unable to run a cable?
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
16 Jun 2005
Posts
14,637
Location
Doncaster
Sadly not as the router is upstairs and the powerline adapter is for the console in the living room.

I currently have the below and I'm finding them to be a bit flakey.

TP-Link TL-PA4010PKIT
 
Soldato
Joined
23 Dec 2009
Posts
18,172
Location
RG8 9
I've been gaming for the last 3 years over WiFi and have had no issues. I'm a causal gamer to be fair but do play online FPS.

I just got a decent router and adapter for my PC and keep the 5Ghz channel to myself.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Dec 2002
Posts
7,251
OK, this should be repetition of what you already know, but here goes:

Powerline 101:

All powerline adapters quote symmetrical bandwidth, so gigabit wired connections would be 2Gbit. Anything other than gigabit class adapters come with 100Mbit ports.

With powerline you avoid surge suppression, so plug it directly into a mains socket, not a spur socket, also your sockets need to be on the same circuit ideally. They don’t handle circuit jumps well - sometimes they will be OK, but it’s a crap shoot (look at your fuse box, if upstairs and downstairs sockets are on a different breaker, then expect problems).

Update firmware - it’ll be the same tool usually that you used to change the default encryption key, but it will also give you insight into the reported sync speed between devices.

Ultimately, powerline isn’t something you use if you have any other option, even if it’s a PITA to run cable, it’s still the default answer.
 
Soldato
Joined
5 Nov 2011
Posts
5,362
Location
Derbyshire
Thanks for the replies. Is the difference compared to wi fi only slight then? I wish I could run a cable but it's not practical :(

Slight, and prone to it's own interference. You are ultimately running RF over a cable that was never designed to take it so whilst some people have good experiences, you will always find those who don't.
Try to minimise the potential problems such as what @Avalon wrote about above if you are going to go down the powerline route but it is worth mentioning that an external cable run can be made with relative ease, vastly more cost effective than powerlines and the doesn't have to be an eyesore as a lot of houses have multiple cables externally and if run considerately are barely noticeable if at all.
 
Soldato
OP
Joined
16 Jun 2005
Posts
14,637
Location
Doncaster
I've got a mate who works for open reach and he said he can run a ethernet cable down the outside for me, so I think I might go for that! Thanks for the help guys.
 
Associate
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Posts
529
Hmmm... I was looking at getting some of these, as the WIFI to my TV occasionally drops. It's not feasible to run a cable. If I didn't go with the powerline, what's the best way to improve the WIFI signal from a Sky hub?
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Jul 2010
Posts
25,728
Hmmm... I was looking at getting some of these, as the WIFI to my TV occasionally drops. It's not feasible to run a cable. If I didn't go with the powerline, what's the best way to improve the WIFI signal from a Sky hub?
For a TV, as long as the speed you get is decent it'll be fine.

Which Sky Hub do you have?
 
Associate
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Posts
529
For a TV, as long as the speed you get is decent it'll be fine.

Which Sky Hub do you have?

It was a new install a couple of months ago with Sky Q. I got told the Sky Q box itself was a WIFI repeater - not feeling that's the case though!?

EDIT: Removed the word "mate". Made me look like a chav.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Jul 2010
Posts
25,728
It was a new install a couple of months ago with Sky Q mate. I got told the Sky Q box itself was a WIFI repeater - not feeling that's the case though!?

it certainly should be, but if the Q Hub and Q box are very close to each other then Engineer would have likely turned off the Wi-Fi functions on the main Q box and cabled them together. Quite a few problems having two powerful signals so close to each other.
 
Associate
Joined
16 Nov 2014
Posts
529
it certainly should be, but if the Q Hub and Q box are very close to each other then Engineer would have likely turned off the Wi-Fi functions on the main Q box and cabled them together. Quite a few problems having two powerful signals so close to each other.
They're about 20ft away as the crow flies. Would they still show as the same Wifi? I often have to reconnect the hub to the qbox when it goes down. Does it sound like a fault?
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Jul 2010
Posts
25,728
They're about 20ft away as the crow flies. Would they still show as the same Wifi? I often have to reconnect the hub to the qbox when it goes down. Does it sound like a fault?

It does sound like the signal between the two isn't great. Call Sky and ask them to take you through a Network Scan.
 
Back
Top Bottom