Soldato
- Joined
- 5 Sep 2009
- Posts
- 2,584
- Location
- God's own country
http://www.yourlocalguardian.co.uk/...188440.Trio_in_court_over_Battersea_lootings/
These little beauties have appeared in court in relation to the scummy lootings.
Looks like 2 of the three arrived in court in tracksuit bottoms.
Respect shown eh?
Now word seems to be that at least one of these has had his family served with an eviction notice.
Bearing in mind, this wasn't the first night of the problems:-
a) Is his family being treated over zealously? Should they be let off?
or
b) Is his family (mother) responsible for his actions as she must have known what he was up to? Ergo the eviction is correct.
or
c) As he is 18, should he have his own benefits affected rather than his Mother's housing in spite of his Mother surely being aware?
Tricky one.
I personally think that this woman is responsible for bringing up a piece of faeces and a father figure may have helped. I think she is everything that is wrong with our society.
But I also grudgingly have to say I think option c) is correct.
What do others think?
These little beauties have appeared in court in relation to the scummy lootings.
Looks like 2 of the three arrived in court in tracksuit bottoms.
Respect shown eh?Now word seems to be that at least one of these has had his family served with an eviction notice.
Bearing in mind, this wasn't the first night of the problems:-
a) Is his family being treated over zealously? Should they be let off?
or
b) Is his family (mother) responsible for his actions as she must have known what he was up to? Ergo the eviction is correct.
or
c) As he is 18, should he have his own benefits affected rather than his Mother's housing in spite of his Mother surely being aware?
Tricky one.
I personally think that this woman is responsible for bringing up a piece of faeces and a father figure may have helped. I think she is everything that is wrong with our society.
But I also grudgingly have to say I think option c) is correct.
What do others think?

