Associate
- Joined
- 17 Jan 2011
- Posts
- 155
Just curious though...is there really a need for so many "improved" CPU cooler products, when the CPU architecture moving onto 32nm?
I mean take the SandyBridge CPU such as the 2500K and 2600K for example...they don't really run too hot, and since they will likely to get shorten lifespan/fried by high voltage (above 1.38 vcore), the voltage would be the limiting factor not the heat...
I still see some people doing higher than 4.6GHz on over 1.40 vcore...and I'm having serious doubt on if they CPU is gonna last, and the temp is not the issue for slowing killing the CPU...
better cooling = higher overclock, simple
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e7/3c2e7078a9869e9d518813af2d0fa6f2837eea4d" alt="Big Grin :D :D"
- On a h50, i can do 4.8ghz on my 2500k, but if i get a h100 i can probably make 5.0ghz @ 1.4v
the closer they perform to custom watercooling loops the better
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2e7/3c2e7078a9869e9d518813af2d0fa6f2837eea4d" alt="Big Grin :D :D"