1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Prince Andrew not served papers as they were handed to his police security.

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Tefal, 11 Sep 2021.

  1. gailjon

    Hitman

    Joined: 10 Nov 2015

    Posts: 908

    Yawn.
     
  2. omnomnom

    Capodecina

    Joined: 9 Mar 2012

    Posts: 11,257

    Yes.
     
  3. plasmahal

    Mobster

    Joined: 5 Feb 2006

    Posts: 4,487

    In the eyes of the law of course not, in the eyes of the ignorant, clearly. :rolleyes::rolleyes:
     
  4. Trig

    Mobster

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 4,975

    Location: Leicestershire

    SOME, of the alleged offences occurred in the UK, and yes, the age of consent in the UK is 16, however in the US it's 18 in the state relevant, so I believe anyways, it does vary in the States from 16-18 depending on where about the offence occurred..
     
  5. jcr

    Wise Guy

    Joined: 29 May 2011

    Posts: 1,487

    Location: southampton

    maybe ask santa to bring you a dictionary this Christmas.
     
  6. explicit4u

    Capodecina

    Joined: 29 Nov 2008

    Posts: 11,203

    Location: London

    10/10 :D :D
     
  7. Dirk Diggler

    Capodecina

    Joined: 6 Jan 2013

    Posts: 17,338

    None of which was being discussed when you said this to me:

    I put forward the case involving Harris, which involved convictions for nonconsensual sex; there are many more, in the UK, abroad, involving adults, involving children. And so on.

    Andrew could quite easily be added to the list if he has a case to answer. And to pick up on the original point, it makes no difference when it was or what age the alleged victim was.

     
  8. plasmahal

    Mobster

    Joined: 5 Feb 2006

    Posts: 4,487

    Fair enough, I don't fundamentally disagree with what you said and why, my point now is in comparison, assuming there is sufficient evidence in both cases, why has this case not been brought forward in a UK court?

    In Rolf Harris' case, there was sufficient evidence to bring a case forward, but seemingly not in this case.
     
  9. Semple

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 5 Mar 2010

    Posts: 8,783

    Don't be obtuse!
     
  10. omnomnom

    Capodecina

    Joined: 9 Mar 2012

    Posts: 11,257

    What is the correct definition of a child?

    The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child defines child as "a human being below the age of 18 years unless under the law applicable to the child, majority is attained earlier".

    Stop thinking its normal and acceptable for middle aged men to sleep with 17 year olds please.
     
  11. Dirk Diggler

    Capodecina

    Joined: 6 Jan 2013

    Posts: 17,338

    I'm really not sure, and personally I actually agree with earlier posters who talked about Sacoolas - if the Americans refuse to acknowledge that she has a case to answer in the UK then they've got a neck on them thinking they should have the right to try other countries citizens.
     
  12. Ahleckz

    Capodecina

    Joined: 7 Nov 2009

    Posts: 18,568

    Location: Glasgow

    Why did you phrase it like you did? Sex without consent isn't sex without consent. It's rape. Call it what it is.
     
  13. Jean-F

    Mobster

    Joined: 14 Apr 2017

    Posts: 2,970

    Location: London

    Obtuse?
    You said; “You’re still a child at 17 even if the legal age of consent is 16.”
    I was going for sardonic :cool:
     
  14. dLockers

    Sgarrista

    Joined: 21 Jan 2010

    Posts: 7,686

    Now define middle age.
     
  15. plasmahal

    Mobster

    Joined: 5 Feb 2006

    Posts: 4,487

    lol, checkmate @omnomnom.....
     
  16. Dirk Diggler

    Capodecina

    Joined: 6 Jan 2013

    Posts: 17,338

    I used that phrase because that's what I read in the news report.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-58550197
     
  17. Trig

    Mobster

    Joined: 18 Oct 2002

    Posts: 4,975

    Location: Leicestershire

    And here is where the media are trying to get into your head...
    He's 61 now, he wasn't at the time, she's 38 now, 17 at the time, he was 40, yet there's no mention of her age now, but there is his, I wonder why...

    However, if he did in fact know she was sex-trafficed then there's an issue, proving that should be the crux of the case, if they can't prove that, then the fact that he allegedly had sex with her multiple times in different countries, and nobody else (unknown) then it could be argued that he was under the impression that they were friends with benefits as/when they met. If he was, and can be proven to have been, sleeping with other girls at the same events then he has less of a leg to stand on.
     
  18. omnomnom

    Capodecina

    Joined: 9 Mar 2012

    Posts: 11,257

    between the age of 40 and 60

    Or not. I couldn’t care less if he was 30 years old. She’s still a child.
     
  19. plasmahal

    Mobster

    Joined: 5 Feb 2006

    Posts: 4,487

    I would totally advocate the legal age of consent being raised to 18 and there fore in-line with voting, drinking, gambling etc. It would make sense to align many of the adult related activities and will make it simpler to understand and enforce legally.

    As it is now, the age of consent is 16 and the onus is on the alleged victim's legal team to prove there was not consent in the UK courts.

    And it's for this reason I believe this will go nowhere.
     
  20. Angilion

    Man of Honour

    Joined: 5 Dec 2003

    Posts: 19,800

    Location: Just to the left of my PC

    Your book is objectively wrong. The idea that a person instantly changes from a child to an adult (with nothing in between) on a birthday you have decided on just isn't reality. Even the law, which is required to set arbitrary limits as a workable solution, doesn't entirely pretend reality is that simple.

    As for adults being children because you say so, that's just silly. At 17, a person is an adult unless their development is restricted in a pathological way (if that's possible). They might or might not be at the age of legal majority (depending on when and where they live), but that's a completely different thing.