Who decides who is a qualified provider?
An evidence based process would be used, who administers it is largely irrelevant.
Who decides who is a qualified provider?
An evidence based process would be used, who administers it is largely irrelevant.
Who would decided what the criteria is?
Elected officials?
Or is your aim here just to use the continuum fallacy in lieu of an actual discussion?
Who elects the officials bearing in mind how vocal you are about the population not being capable of doing so?
Ok, it's the continuum fallacy, glad we cleared that up.
We have a system of elected officials now, they don't always make evidence based decisions as you point out so vociferously.
How would you ensure the right people were elected, it is a perfectly reasonable question.
Good luck.

Alleged Home Secretary Theresa May only discovered 16 days before the Olympic Games started that private contractor G4S would not have enough underpaid and untrained thugs to stop people promoting brands not involved in sponsorship and terrorists attacking the Olympics. As a result, the Olympics will be policed by squaddies more accustomed to beating up and shooting foreigners.
Private scamming once again rips off the public purse.
On an oblique track, a spy in London tells me that in some places, one lane in some roads has been given over to whizzing Very Important Sponsors around the city whilst the other lane is reserved for buses . . . result - nobody else can use that particular route![]()