I got my Aego's for less than £70 inc.vat and delivery![]()
Hey. No fair.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
I'm not really a big fan of computer speakers, but I have to admit that you did stumble onto a bargain.
I got my Aego's for less than £70 inc.vat and delivery![]()
Ah, the good old Sciroccos [or Crossfires if you wanted 4.0]. Always wanted some, never tried 'em. Would be interesting to see how they compare nowadays.[...] The only quality computer speakers I have ever heard were the Videologic ones about 5yrs back. They were good and I was impressed with them. I found that they were only as good as separates, but not better. [...]
A new Cambridge Audio A1 is £99 from the competitively-priced big red hi-fi specialists; the equivalent Gales are £50. Even taking into consideration the recent 20 quid price hike of the Aegos, that's still a considerable percentage more for a noticeably inferior sound.[...] The Cambridge Audio and Gale setup was obviously budget oriented and the cost of buying these new would be around £120 (at a guess). What if though, you were to go for 2nd hand speakers/amp and compare the Aego M speakers to those (in other words, the Aego will now compete against separates that, when new, would've cost around £200-250, but 2nd hand would cost around £80-100)? [...]
You're right with your first point: their conveniently diminutive size is a considerable factor in the Aegos' sales 'attack'. But if you've got separates of quality that you're happy with, it'd be a silly waste to drop money on new hardware, of course.[...] What the Aego M's have in their favour is there bedroom friendly size. Its ok to have huge floor standers in a living room, but for a smaller bedroom, the Aego would score heavily due to their diminutive size. This is what interested me initially in the Aego M speakers - good sound, small size. It was only after I quickly paired up my old Sony amp with the Mission M70 (that I already had), that I realised what great sound quality, even the smaller M70 speakers, offer.
EDIT: for games, I think the Aego speakers would win, due to their dedicated sub and the importance of bone shaking bass preferred for game audio.
I've never heard [or indeed heard of, until now] these, so I can neither agree nor disagree with you. They look promising, if less well-constructed. There's precious little info available that I could get. Do you have a set? And have you compared them to Aegos? I'd be interested to hear morePhnom_Penh said:And yet the Swan M10's **** all over the Aego's and they cost less.![]()
There are no UK suppliers, but there are suppliers who ship to the ukI thought the Swan M10s were not available in the UK? Or are they?
Well yeah, they only cost $100-ish so they're not going to look as well constructed, but they sound a lot better. A mate has a set, and I *used* (now getting M10sI've never heard [or indeed heard of, until now] these, so I can neither agree nor disagree with you. They look promising, if less well-constructed. There's precious little info available that I could get. Do you have a set? And have you compared them to Aegos? I'd be interested to hear more![]()
The only person who mentions logitech doesn't sound like an idiot. And the Logitech Z2300s are fairly goodThey are in effect comparing these to Logitech computer speakers.
The only person who mentions logitech doesn't sound like an idiot. And the Logitech Z2300s are fairly good.
whats ironic, is that they arent loud at all![]()
I said they weren't bad, I never said they were top class or anything (ok, they're the best Logitech do). And no I never said I liked them, you might have noticed I've been talking about M10's which boast a massive 40w rmsI havent heard the logitech z2300s, however, from some of the reviews Ive read, they are loud, but untamed. In general, the cheaper speakers tend to boast huge wattage. And anyone reviewing those types of speakers tend to concentrate a lot of how loud they are. When a user opinion talks more specifically about the midrange and higher frequencies, they use the word "muddled", quite often. This is what scares me off a speaker package. Myself, I am more interested in the actual quality of the sound they produce - clarity and easy on the ear. I find big, boomy, untamed bass, very fatiguing. Each to their own though. If you like loud and boomy bass, then cheap computer speakers could actually serve you well and save you a lot of money.
One thing's for sure, audio equipment is very subjective.
I said they weren't bad, I never said they were top class or anything (ok, they're the best Logitech do).
whats ironic, is that they arent loud at all![]()
tbh, I wouldn't be surprised if the sound of the 2300's sound better than the 5500s. Although I was talking wrt to this thread (ie 2.1)I thought the Z5500 are Logitech's best speaker package?
Depends where you look, on head-fi, everyone says they're crap (and I agree). On most PC forums they're the best thing since sliced bread (and Razer Barracuda's are the best headphones money can buy).OIC.
Its just that I read quite a few reviews and all of them indicate that the Z5500's are absolutely mind-blowing. The Americans, especially, seem to love them.
For £200 they're absolute pants. An av receiver and separates would walk all over them.
Not for you no, some people they are, I would say for 1 single little 8" driver it's got some pretty loud bass.
Not for you no, some people they are, I would say for 1 single little 8" driver it's got some pretty loud bass.
And deep bass? A subwoofer tuned high can play loud. I see most replies with the log are to do with "going loud" and what about quality?
it has but its localized, near-field type bass. computer speakers are the speakers that you place a few feet away from you. you know - couple on the desk, center under the monitor, rears just about an equal distance behind you. easy to achieve the those spl's - its the same with my little GenEXXA monitors i have on my desk. sitting virtually on top of them, they are perceivable very loud indeed. i wouldnt expect 5 or 7 of them in the corners of my room to achieve anything like what my main system can![]()
My 5.1's sound the best about 4 meter away from them, cant test any further because my room is not big enough. But dont you have something like 2x 12" subs? So it would not be surprising if you would need 7 Z2300's to beat them, but is it not dependant on the enclosure aswell? Building a new enclosure for these logitech drivers should help I would have thought, I went over to ROE Forums and asked them about sticking another sub in my z5500 and they told me I would proberbly get better gains in SPL and SQ putting the Logi's 10" in a new enclosure rather than buying another 10" like an alpine type r or something. But then I would need a new amp anyway.
i did have upstairs. down here i dont need it. ive got the one 3.5 cubic foot box with a 12" driver. its good for 115db at 30hz so i dont really need any more than that. however, i am looking at building a similar sized box bot with a 15" driver as my 12" is nowhere near as efficient below 25hz or so down here as it was up there. its funny just how much the room affects the response of the speakers