Permabanned
- Joined
- 23 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 23,552
- Location
- Hertfordshire
A VR RPG would probably get me buying one. Skyrim VR.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
A VR RPG would probably get me buying one. Skyrim VR.
A VR RPG would probably get me buying one. Skyrim VR.
As thats what they are for, they are for everyone with a headset, or those going to buy one.![]()
The thing is they do have one main problem and that is how they decide to handle the aiming of the gun in combination with the 'Free Look' with the headset. If you think about that for a minute it would be quite a tricky thing to master and to get just right. I hope they manage to do it as it will make things like Battlefield a truly amazing experience.
Not very often someone looks right but shoots left.
I know its getting a bit off topic but surely its easy. You look around with your head and the gun direction is the controllers in your hand ? Doesnt matter if you move your head around when you have a gun generally it points in the same direction as your head. So you move your head to the right the scene moves to the right but as your hands are stationary the gun doesnt move in the scene.
Again you still have the issue with Looking and Aiming, but yes a great immersive RPG would do VR the world of good at the moment. Maybe they could have a movable reticle that was free to move within the users viewpoint?
That would certainly take a bit of getting used to, but could possibly work.![]()
As thats what they are for, they are for everyone with a headset, or those going to buy one.![]()
As thats what they are for, they are for everyone with a headset, or those going to buy one.![]()
Funnily enough I told people the exact opposite.
Now I will repeat this for the last time. Neither my employer or myself have any affiliation, investment or dependence with nvidia in any official or unofficial capacity. All NDAs are null and void, all information obtained under NDA is now public domain and the extent of that information was exceedingly limited (basic drive px2 exists, is based on pascal and is being used by auto OEMs) and was public domain before being acquired so was meaningless.
Your still hella biased! Glad im not the only one to notice it. Allways pro Nvidia negative AMD with a sprinkle of pro AMD every blue moon to try and make it appear your not baised.
err, not exactly. They are essentially R9 390's (or better) with new GCN4 architecture at $200.
i.e Also great gaming GPU's regardless of VR for a great price.
"As we look to fully connect and immerse humanity through VR, cost remains the daylight between VR being only for the select few, and universal access for everyone. The Radeon RX Series is a disruptive technology that adds rocket fuel to the VR inflection point, turning it into a technology with transformative relevance to consumers."
-Raja Koduri, senior vice president and chief architect for AMD's Radeon technologies.
They are, they are for the VR market, thats the TAM.
As you posted above from Raja.
They are, they are for the VR market, thats the TAM.
As you posted above from Raja.
Watch this whole thing and be amazed:However, it's the FPS that everyone really wants to have a go at with VR. The thing is they do have one main problem and that is how they decide to handle the aiming of the gun in combination with the 'Free Look' with the headset. If you think about that for a minute it would be quite a tricky thing to master and to get just right.
The TAM isnt just VR dude. By definition or even just abbreviation the Total Available Market isnt just VR.
Otherwise it would be the TAVRM![]()
...as not only me, but two others clearly noted, this is NOT a VR only card.