• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

[Review] Inno3D GTS450 I-Chill [56K Warning]

Associate
Joined
1 Aug 2010
Posts
9
Hello Guys,

Sorry for my English, but Hope you will understand me :-)

Today i would show you a new Inno3D card, called GTS450 I-Chill.

This card mounts a Fermi GF106 Chipset, the new nVidia Mainstream core.

In first thanks to Inno3D because let me the possibility to test the VGA.

If you want read all the review you can check the follow link:

http://www.pcbrain.it/index.php/articoli/4-vga/835-inno3d-gts450-i-chill-fermi-si-fa-mainstream.html


Now we can begin this review with the card specification


scheda2.png



VGA Core works at 820 MHz and CudaCores at 1640MHz. Memory clock is 950 MHz. Memory Bandwith, due to connection interface at 128 bit, is 60,8 GB/s.
GTS450 I-Chill supports nVidia SLi Technology untill a maximum of two cards, but it also supports nVidia Physx, 3DVision Surround, GeForce Cuda and Pure Video HD.
As all the Fermi Card, also the new one works with DX11.


Below you can find some pictures of the VGA:


01.JPG


02.JPG


03.JPG


04.JPG


05.JPG


06.JPG


07.JPG


08.JPG


09.JPG


10.JPG


11.JPG


12.JPG


13.JPG



For the test i used the this platform:


piattaforma.png



I made different test for try to understand how work this card.

I want to clarify that is a MainStream VGA, so each time benchmark was been launched with mainstream graphics setting.

In the first part of test i used VGA at stock frequency (820 MHz/ 1640 MHz / 950 MHz), but CPU, Uncore and memory was been overclocked for avoid bottle neck. CPU Worked at 4000 MHz, memory at 1600 MHz 8 8 8 24 1T and Uncore at 3200 MHz.

Than i try to see how a 24/7 VGA Overclock could offer me better performance, and this time core clock worked at 920 MHz, Cuda Core at 1840 MHz and memory at 1100 MHz.

In the third part of test i try to push to the limit the card, for find the Overclock limit.

And last part of test was conducted for check the Heat Sink Performance.


In the below graphics you can see the card performance at stock frequency (820 MHz / 1640 MHz / 950 MHz).


3d06.png


vantage.png


farcry2.png


crysis.png


hawx.png


res5.png


stalker.png


dirt2.png


furmark.png


stone.png


tropic.png


heaven.png



Now you can see how a daily Overclock can bring benefits to the performance. Card worked at 920MHz / 1840 MHz / 1100 MHz.


crysis.png


dirt2.png


farcry2.png


heaven.png



Go to see what are GTS450 I-Chill Overclock limits.


With 1.05V (Default Voltage) card can work without problem with a core overclocked at 960 MHz, and with memory at 1200 MHz.


no_ov.jpg



But if I go to set voltage at 1,162V, core VGA reaches a cool frequency, 1025 MHz.


si_ov.jpg



Temperatures are very impressive with this card, because with Fans Heat Sink at 30%, maximum temperature legged is 47°C.


auto.jpg



If i set the Fans at 50% of their maximum regime, core temperature reach 45°C.


50.jpg



With Fans at 100% we got 45°C.


70.jpg



In the following video you can hear the noise from the Heat Sink Fan.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AdEQC6MkuI
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the review. I gotta be honest, the only reason I would consider one of these is for a dedicated PhysX card.

If you or anyone else can shed light on how effective the GTS450 is as a dedicated PhysX card that would be very useful :)
 
If the price is right, I think this would definitely be worth considering as an entry level gaming card alternate to 5750/5770 for people that are really on a tight budget. Not saying it is faster than the 5750/5770, just think it's nice that people would have more choices to choose from :)
 
If the price is right, I think this would definitely be worth considering as an entry level gaming card alternate to 5750/5770 for people that are really on a tight budget. Not saying it is faster than the 5750/5770, just think it's nice that people would have more choices to choose from :)

Would agree there mate, more choice equals competition equals lower prices, all good for the consumer.:)
 
With prices starting at £99.99 on OCUK this card is just too expensive. Sould have been at least a tenner cheaper. Another £15 get's you a 5770 or £28 for a 768mb 460.
May be. But what I'm interested to know is how much real performance increase do the card provide with the overclock. Also if the screenshot above for the temp is accurate, the card is VERY cool running (may be due to the cooler) so it should overclock very well; would nice to see how a max overclocked GTS450 compare to an overclocked 5770.
 
Sorry for the long time, but i couldn t reply before..... i was very very busy.

Card performance was good, but i used 259.22 Beta driver (I found it inside the VGA box), so maybe with new driver performance will be better.

However Inno3D choose a triple slot cooler because the chip is very sensible to the temps, and so with low value is possible get high clock ;-)

For performance in Overclock (core was at 1020 MHz), i got 23 FPS with Crysis Warhead benchmark.
map: Airfield Fly Trough
Detail: Enthusiast DX10
AA2X
1680 x 1050

CPU was a 920 at 3.8 GHz and memory at 1600 8 8 8 24
 
Battlefield has not the benchmark in the bundle.

With fraps you can see the average frame rate right? but in every scene this frame rate could be different, because each time i must play to run benchmark, and is impossible see every time the same scene, with same enemy and same explosion etc.... and so every run could be different, because play is totay different by a fixed scene.

If in the game there will be a fixed scene, will be possible use fraps ;-)
 
Back
Top Bottom