lol, utter tosh mate. Tosh to the extreme. If you think that stating fact demonstrates an emotional investment then I think you need to refine your comprehension skills before you can make any accusations of bias or inability to debate. And furthermore, if any statement of fact that casts X company in a negative light is interpreted as emotionally-fuelled bias, I'd suggest the real bias lies with those who made such accusations.
Kindly point out anything I posted to be factually untrue. Illustrate to me any points of bias. The only emotional influences that present themselves in my posting is when trolls and fanbois start accusing me of the very thing they are guilty of, and I will retort every single time, because - believe it or not - nothing riles me up like those incapable of discussing matters because of their own inherent bias and emotional attachment to inconsequential nonsense.
So since you believe I am incapable of debate, the floor is yours. Discuss the points I raised, counter them if you believe I am incorrect.
Mate, you used the words "Milk, Stomped, Overpriced, Insane, Joke, Illegal and Fleeced".
But somehow you've endeavoured to suggest that I'm biased?
I mean I know you're not exactly writing a peer reviewed academic research paper, but seriously? It seems like you've spent too long in an echo chamber.
*edit* Oh I missd out the word stupid. You used that too.
*edit2* you used fanboys and idiots as well....
Just to reiterate, my point is that your emotive language clearly demonstrates inherent bias. Hence I don't think it's realistically possible to debate anything with you.