Santa Fe Wi-Fi Fears Keep Getting Weirder (Does this crap also happen in the UK?)

Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
5,780
A group of Santa Fe residents recently attempted to get all public Wi-Fi hotspots in the city banned by arguing that the APs irritated their supposed "electromagnetic allergies." More curious perhaps was how the group tried to use the Americans With Disabilities Act to force the city's hand. Now the Santa Fe New Mexican reports that one of the individuals involved in the effort has sued his neighbor for refusing to turn off their cellphone and Wi-Fi hotspot. Arthur Firstenberg claims he was made homeless by the neighbor, who apparently didn't appreciate his unique ailment. Firstenberg's legal argument is a bit of a treat, suggesting he's been forced to live in his car:
Firstenberg "cannot stay in a hotel, because hotels and motels all employ wi-fi connections, which trigger a severe illness," says the request for a preliminary injunction. "If (Firstenberg) cannot obtain preliminary relief, he will be forced to continue to sleep in his car, enduring winter cold and discomfort, until this case can be heard." The case has been assigned to state District Judge Daniel Sanchez, who has yet to set a hearing.
Maybe we forgot to mention it, but there's absolutely no evidence that suggests Wi-Fi impacts human health, and the science that does exist strongly suggests that those claiming to be suffering from "electromagnetic sensitivity" are simply suffering from psychosomatic disorders, and might be helped by therapy and/or medication.

Source
 
A guy I used to work with used to wrap the wireless routers in work in tin foil to stop the rays getting him.

Amused us greatly when we moved into our new building and routers were in the ceiling and he couldn't get to them.
 
he will be forced to continue to sleep in his car

Haha, WiFi ate my brain, his crack is obviously too strong. Give him a strong dose of radiation and stick him in a Faraday cage for life. :D
 
If he does suffer from such a condition... and personally I don't believe it for a moment but I'm not gonna say its impossible either... its an unreasonable request to make to a neighbour... hes gonna have to find a house in the middle of nowhere.
 
I remember hearing something similar where some people were complaining about wireless signals and as a test they switched them all off and they said they all felt better.


Thing is...they didn't actually switch them off.
 
If he does suffer from such a condition... and personally I don't believe it for a moment but I'm not gonna say its impossible either... its an unreasonable request to make to a neighbour... hes gonna have to find a house in the middle of nowhere.

I will triad him, really I hate living here.

I remember hearing something similar where some people were complaining about wireless signals and as a test they switched them all off and they said they all felt better.


Thing is...they didn't actually switch them off.

Doesn't take a genius to know the jerks are lieing about this "wireless allergy". The dopes do know TV & radio is wireless to don't they.
 
Last edited:
I remember hearing something similar where some people were complaining about wireless signals and as a test they switched them all off and they said they all felt better.


Thing is...they didn't actually switch them off.

yep

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1558441/Mobile-phone-masts-do-not-damage-health.html

The tests were carried out under double-blind conditions, under which neither participants nor those running the experiments knew whether the signal was off or on during sessions.

Those in the EH group reported more symptoms and symptoms of greater severity regardless of whether the signal was on or off.


There were no differences in the physiological measurements when the equipment was switched on, except those in the sensitive group reported elevated levels of agitation and skin sweatiness.
 
The link in the original story to the evidence that strongly suggests people who claim this condition may simply have psychosomatic disorders makes for interesting conditions. The human brain truly is a remarkable thing.
 
A group of Santa Fe residents recently attempted to get all public Wi-Fi hotspots in the city banned by arguing that the APs irritated their supposed "electromagnetic allergies." More curious perhaps was how the group tried to use the Americans With Disabilities Act to force the city's hand. Now the Santa Fe New Mexican reports that one of the individuals involved in the effort has sued his neighbor for refusing to turn off their cellphone and Wi-Fi hotspot. Arthur Firstenberg claims he was made homeless by the neighbor, who apparently didn't appreciate his unique ailment. Firstenberg's legal argument is a bit of a treat, suggesting he's been forced to live in his car:
Firstenberg "cannot stay in a hotel, because hotels and motels all employ wi-fi connections, which trigger a severe illness," says the request for a preliminary injunction. "If (Firstenberg) cannot obtain preliminary relief, he will be forced to continue to sleep in his car, enduring winter cold and discomfort, until this case can be heard." The case has been assigned to state District Judge Daniel Sanchez, who has yet to set a hearing.
Maybe we forgot to mention it, but there's absolutely no evidence that suggests Wi-Fi impacts human health, and the science that does exist strongly suggests that those claiming to be suffering from "electromagnetic sensitivity" are simply suffering from psychosomatic disorders, and might be helped by therapy and/or medication.

Source

Cool story bro

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypochondriasis
 
I do believe that people can suffer from electromagnetic hypersensitivity but I don't think that it is well understood due to the small amount of people that suffer from it and the lack of research.
 
Back
Top Bottom