Associate
Ironically HMS Cumberland (along with the rest of the type 22s) was on her last voyage home to be scrapped when this kicked off... turns out warships are quite useful.
Are you willing to pay for this then?
Sending the SAS in is a little of over the top.
What are going to do if the workers were attacked? Fire at them? I think not!!
Ironically HMS Cumberland (along with the rest of the type 22s) was on her last voyage home to be scrapped when this kicked off... turns out warships are quite useful.
Indeed, good on them using the SAS to get our folks out safely (or as safely as possible)![]()
how come everyone forgets about the SBS? isnt there training even harder than the SAS![]()
Irony?
how come everyone forgets about the SBS? isnt there training even harder than the SAS![]()
I didn't say getting shot, i said attacked!
And i still believe they wouldn't open fire.
Think about what the media would do if they found out the SAS gunned a few people down because they started to stone some oil rig.

how come everyone forgets about the SBS? isnt there training even harder than the SAS![]()
Well the US sent a hired catamaran, despite having the biggest Navy in the worldMaybe irony isn't the right word, but it shows how unpredictable world events can be - a few months after we decide to scrap ships we end up needing them on their final voyage home. If this had happenened a few months from now there may have been no ships available at all. Governments often come to regret defence cuts - ten year rule anyone?
.Very much so, they like the SAS stealing the limelight (funding maybe not so much).The SAS are just more in the public eye since a certain embassy siege in 1980 and Mrs Thatcher using them to mop up a prison riot in the 1980s.
The SBS seen to be in the shadows, probably just how they like it.
Libya has also protested about the British military hardware in the area, and going into the country.
Do we think there is a bit of posturing in this, or is this just the necessary measures to get the rest of the people out?
.It might well have been the SBS that did the job in Libya but not that many people will know about them compared to their Army counterparts.
The SAS are just more in the public eye since a certain embassy siege in 1980 and Mrs Thatcher using them to mop up a prison riot in the 1980s.
The SBS seen to be in the shadows, probably just how they like it.
As for training, a mate of mine that I have known since school joined the Marines and was extremely fit and equally switched on and mentally tough. He went for SF selection and failed and said it wasn't for him and that made me think about just how much that the SBS and also SAS must be in terms if the next evolution in military terms.
As for training, a mate of mine that I have known since school joined the Marines and was extremely fit and equally switched on and mentally tough. He went for SF selection and failed and said it wasn't for him and that made me think about just how much that the SBS and also SAS must be in terms if the next evolution in military terms.
A massive amount of training and mental toughness is expected before you even contemplate joining, my old man served 22 during the late 70's early 80's and some of the stories make your hair curl :/

The RN are still going to be maintaining a (relatively) huge escort fleet after the defence cuts, no doubt the Navy will be using this though as good propaganda to keep a larger fleet. Bet they're grinning from ear to ear that it was Cumberland and not one of the 13 Type 23 Frigates that we have in various places around the world.Maybe irony isn't the right word, but it shows how unpredictable world events can be - a few months after we decide to scrap ships we end up needing them on their final voyage home. If this had happenened a few months from now there may have been no ships available at all. Governments often come to regret defence cuts - ten year rule anyone?