Self Defense ?

[rypt]

I say choke them out or make them tap out

 

[The Halk]

I watched a season of it recently. In memory it's blunt crap comedy, but actually watching it I find it's much better than I imagined. The couple of series at least are extremely well done. But you weren't in it then

 

[Podmonkey]

It all depends on what can be proven. He could have come at you with a knife and you break his arm but if they cant find the knife and there are no witnesses then its your word against theirs and hes the one with the injury. Same situation and theres witnesses and the weapon is recovered and its an entirely different possible outcome.

 

[rotters]

set me correct if you wish, but is it correct that in a position of threat against yourself, family or property you can strike first??

I train in JuiJitsu and one of our 3rd dans is ex police...so is this still the case??



rotters

 

[tom_e]

set me correct if you wish, but is it correct that in a position of threat against yourself, family or property you can strike first??

I train in JuiJitsu and one of our 3rd dans is ex police...so is this still the case??



rotters

Yes, as far as I'm aware you can strike first if you fear for your or another persons safety.

 

[Von Smallhausen]

set me correct if you wish, but is it correct that in a position of threat against yourself, family or property you can strike first??

I train in JuiJitsu and one of our 3rd dans is ex police...so is this still the case??



rotters

You can pre-emptively strike if you perceive such a threat but it clearly has to be proportionate.

 

[The Badger]

Its if you can Justify what you have done in a court.

 

[Vonhelmet]

It would be worth it for the look on the burglar's face.

' Get out or you vil be shot. '

Offtopic and you may have seen it before, but nevertheless...

Ask Herr Flick

 

[The Halk]

Saw that a couple of weeks ago.