Soldato
- Joined
- 16 Jan 2003
- Posts
- 10,824
- Location
- Nottingham
I rarely even use my physical cards these days, 99% of the time I use Apple Pay on my watch. Unless you find the very rare shop that doesn’t do contactless payments.
I save the coins up until I got about 60p worth (price of subsidised sandwich) and just take them in and use them on my break. When I hear of folk who just chuck them away, it's like getting a free sandwich isn't it.
And for “Most popular colleague” ? Who cares. The chocolate and crisps are priced at 47p and 26p respectively so I would assume they need coinage for change.
I rarely even use my physical cards these days, 99% of the time I use Apple Pay on my watch. Unless you find the very rare shop that doesn’t do contactless payments.
Okay Lee, makes more sense now, I was thinking of £3, £4, or £5
sandwiches, and you pumping in 3 or 4 hundred pennies, sorry.
It’s only the Disney Store that I use that doesn’t take contactless.Shouldn't all places be taking contactless now as I'm sure some of the old chip&pin pads from when chip&pin first came out don't comply with regs anymore and should have been replaced. I could be talking ******** though.
Still wouldn't bother me if I put more in but I usually keep to the cheaper sandwiches as a snack.
Still your call Lee, but do you see what I meant about being "Most popular colleague", when you're pumping
a gazillion pennies in to the machine, and there are others waiting, with £1 or £2 coins for their sandwiches.
You probably can't buy just one litre, there are often minimum puchase amounts. But if you did, you could either pay £1.37 by card, or £1.35 or £1.40 by cash.
In reality, someone is going to be filling up a car. So around 30 litres.
30 x £1.37 = £41.10
haha a round number
31 x £1.37 = £42.47
so you'd pay either £42.47 by card, or £42.45 or £42.50 by cash.
Contactless is being driven by banks, not law. Banks get a 0% cut of a cash transaction, and cash can circulate for a long time in between visits to a bank.Don't think there are regs enforcing it.
Contactless is being driven by banks, not law. Banks get a 0% cut of a cash transaction, and cash can circulate for a long time in between visits to a bank.
I never said it wasn't convenient and popular. But cash is a means of exchange between people. Cards are a means of exchange between banks. Perhaps it's another old person thing. Once you hit 50 you start to look back and see how small things can turn out to have big consequences; history becomes something a bit more tangible, something we actually influenced... for better or worse.Lol, Contactless is being driven by consumer convenience.
i get your point, but even if the missus needs a few quid its onto the banking app and within 30s its in her account.But cash is a means of exchange between people.
Why though? What benefit do you actually have of using a physical currency over electronic?
I can tell you exactly why i prefer electronic over physical, so those who seem pretty against moving away from physical currency should be able to say why.
Look at the silly technophobes and their hatred of nothingness, it's beautiful.
i get your point, but even if the missus needs a few quid its onto the banking app and within 30s its in her account.
Do you hold all the purse stings like?
Sure get rid of 1p and 2p if you must (personally I wouldn't) but idea of getting rid of physical cash is just absurd. Might be fine if you only ever spend your money at huge corporates but not so on a more local level. My local social club where I go for a few pints is cash only, so is the juke box and pool board in said club. The takeaway joints on the way home are all cash only, and the local corner store only like cards if you are spending loads of money - no good if you just want a pint of milk and cheap no brand energy drink. Cash is still very much king but we've had this topic before.
Eh no, contactless took over last year for purchases, Cash is at best a holdover, while cheques are still jokes.
But you can't use contactless if they don't take cards full stop!