Who is paying for them?
You would as the owner of the car; I don't see an issue. Less poor people on the road.
Who is paying for them?
Who is paying for them?
You would as the owner of the car; I don't see an issue. Less poor people on the road.
The same person who pays for tyres with at least 1.6mm of tread at the moment.
Something of note is that there are areas in Switzerland where there are local winter tyre restrictions in place (and also others where you need winter tyres and chains), even if it isn't a federal requirement.[TW]Fox;17915447 said:Even some countries with sustained snowfall don't mandate winter tyres. In Germany only certain regions mandate the use of winter tyres, and suprisingly there is no requirement for winter tyres in Switzerland.
A lot of the winter tyre sites use clever wording about insurance things though, take this for example about Switzerland:
Well duh - generally, if you CAUSE an accident, you are liable, even if you cause an accident when it's 32c outside!
currently legal
Ok, so we are only thinking about it for 5 of 12 months of the year... yeah, completely irrelevantMakes me laugh it really does, come Febuary/March it'll all be forgotten about until next year

someone suggested that the council should have a stock of snow chains that people can use over the winter. Pay a deposit, use the chains over winter, then return them for your deposit less some small fee.

Ok, so we are only thinking about it for 5 of 12 months of the year... yeah, completely irrelevant![]()
being told you would have to have a second set of tyres for the winter months because people cant drive in a bit of ice and snow for a couple of weeks a year

Ok so 5% of the time we drive around in snow. About 4 years of someone's life is spent travelling in snowy conditions - in fact, more time than is spent going to the toilet. Should we not bother with toilet paper, or toilet flushes?

Ok so 5% of the time we drive around in snow. About 4 years of someone's life is spent travelling in snowy conditions - in fact, more time than is spent going to the toilet. Should we not bother with toilet paper, or toilet flushes?![]()
You could use your hand or a stick, as some people do. Toilet paper is not essential, just like snow tyres are not essential (you just need tyres; you just need something to take the crap off your backside).Its hardly the same argument as we are discussing, changing something we already use for something thats better (define better) is not the same as stopping using something at all
You could use your hand, as some people do. Toilet paper is not essential, just like snow tyres are not essential (you just need tyres; you just need something to take the crap off your backside).
The argument that we shouldn't mandate winter tyres because it's only for a couple of weeks a year is what I am focussing on. My point is that, actually, 5% of the time is a pretty significant proportion. The arguments for having tyres on them with >1.6mm of tread start to erode away when you think 5% of the time is not worth worrying about. A tyre with 1mm of tread will stop pretty decently in the dry, and the appropriately wet conditions that mean that the stopping distance is significantly increased are probably not much more than 5% of the time you are driving, and in those conditions stopping distances are only increased by maybe 100%, yet in bad winter conditions it can be many multiples of that.I know snow tyres are not essential thats my point, I wouldnt want them to become a legal requirment for the reasons i've already mentioned and maybe its just me but tyres and toilet paper arent really comparable items in this context