sigma or canon 24-70mm 2.8f?

Raymond Lin · 17 Dec 2010 at 13:42

rG-tom said:
No i don't take back anything I ever said about the 105, it was a VERY sharp lens, the IS was nice and the extra reach was also nice, but extra light can't be beaten.

What I would like is a 24-105 F2.8IS.....

Yeah, but I told you that, the extra stop...for ages you wouldn't budge!

And 24-105 2.8 IS, that is the holy grail. Hell, 24-70 2.8 IS would be enough lol

rG-tom · 17 Dec 2010 at 14:39

It was only when i started doing a lot of band photography that i made the jump

Columbo · 17 Dec 2010 at 14:57

rG-tom said:
What I would like is a 24-105 F2.8IS.....

Ruddy hell how heavy would that be? :eek:

Raymond Lin · 17 Dec 2010 at 15:01

rG-tom said:
It was only when i started doing a lot of band photography that i made the jump

More extreme situations eh?

mcc49 · 17 Dec 2010 at 17:56

Since when did the 24-105L extends internally when zooming? Or maybe mine is defective as it goes in and out quite abit when zooming...

Raymond Lin · 17 Dec 2010 at 18:04

mcc49 said:
Since when did the 24-105L extends internally when zooming? Or maybe mine is defective as it goes in and out quite abit when zooming...

I have no idea, and it's not that more smaller than the 24-70 either.

Half way down for side by side photos.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/reviews/canon-ef-24-105mm-f-4-l-is-usm-lens-review.aspx

I think the guy just like to troll? along with his pics in the "national press".