Blind ignorance as they blame their brother for a heavy 3 day gaming session on it now it will not post at all as the 1.65V has damaged it!! Wonder if Intel will even replace as they may be able to tell if the volts were too high as think the DTS sensors may register this info.Save me searching - how did they take it?
"Oh well, it's my own fault. Those voltages were too much for the chip. Haha! At least I'm famous for a day"
or
"This is so unfair OMG. It's like totally wrong of Intel to make a chip that fries when I stick far too much voltage in! I'm going to RMA!"
Kinda makes me glad I haven't taken the voltage plunge yet.
well i ordered a new i7 intel are sending me a new one they said that it sould not of burnt out at thoose volts and that it may of been a defect (or something like that) and that they want my chip and they will send me a new one they also said that i should try to overclock and over volt to the same levels again and see if it handles it, I said that im not going to volt it so high and that i will set it at 4.0Ghz
Just reading this from the guru3d thread, sounds like utter BS to me.
Your Q6600 is completely different tech to that of i7. Although not reomended you could prob get away with 1.6vcore for benching.
I've even gone all the way to 1.6 with mine.

my Q6600 is only running 3gig at stock voltage tho - don't really need the extra power so I'd rather not put any extra strain on it for now til I do...(he has something like 3 x GTX280...).
