Soviet Marshal Georgi Zhukov: The High Cost of Defending Stalingrad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Soldato
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
5,328
The German army was poised to capture the Russian city of Stalingrad in the fall of 1942. To prevent this, Soviet Marshal Georgi Zhukov devised a two-part plan: On the southern half of the Russian front, Zhukov would engage the Germans at Stalingrad directly; on the northern half, he would launch surprise attacks intended to break through the German lines and divert enemy troops away from Stalingrad. Zhukov did save the city, but Operation Mars proved to be one of the costliest military campaigns ever.

Having risen through the ranks of the Soviet army after serving in World War I, Zhukov insisted during the 1930s that the army be modernized. The thousands of new planes and tanks he succeeded in having built may have saved the Soviet Union from collapse in the face of Germany's 1941 invasion. As a strategist, Zhukov relied on overwhelming force, which allowed him to launch simultaneous offensives in order to surround enemy units. This approach proved effective in defending Leningrad and Moscow, so Zhukov amassed a force of more than 1.5 million troops for his plan to liberate Stalingrad.

In the north, massive Soviet artillery bombardment led to several breakthroughs in the German lines, but Zhukov underestimated the effects of wintry weather and German anti-tank defenses. German artillery destroyed frozen roads easily, preventing Soviet reinforcements from reaching the front, and the suddenly isolated Soviet attackers were butchered.

Perhaps because of his history of success, Zhukov refused to call off the offensive until weeks later, when he had lost 500,000 men--more than the United States lost during all of World War II. But because his forces in the south were able to encircle and destroy the German Sixth Army at Stalingrad, Zhukov's record remained untarnished. He ensured his status as the Soviet Union's greatest war hero when he led the army into Berlin two years later.
 

A

A

Wise Guy
Permabanned
Joined
23 Oct 2002
Posts
1,793
Location
Leicestershire
great post myb thanks for that, intresting and informative

Originally posted by MindYerBeak
Zhukov refused to call off the offensive until weeks later, when he had lost 500,000 men--more than the United States lost during all of World War II.

says something about the americans
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
6,830
Location
London
a great post!

the battle for Stalingrad was one of the most gruesome in the whole war, and most probably the costliest in human life terms.

i would recomend anyone read Stalingrad. its an amazing read.

thanks MYB
 
Man of Honour
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
12,302
Location
Vvardenfell
Total Russian casualties were about 20 million - nearly a third of all those in WW2 (the Chinese were the next biggest group).

Zhukov was once at a meeting of allied leaders and generals. Eisenhour was telling him of all the marvellous western inventions for clearing mines. Zhukov looked straight at him and said: "I've found the best way of clearing a minefield is to march a brigade of infantry through it". And he wasn't joking either.

M
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
6,830
Location
London
Originally posted by Meridian
Total Russian casualties were about 20 million - nearly a third of all those in WW2 (the Chinese were the next biggest group).

Zhukov was once at a meeting of allied leaders and generals. Eisenhour was telling him of all the marvellous western inventions for clearing mines. Zhukov looked straight at him and said: "I've found the best way of clearing a minefield is to march a brigade of infantry through it". And he wasn't joking either.

M

they lost over 1 million at Stalingrad alone!

Stalin adn his generals had a complete lack or respect for human life. especially their own men!
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
14,154
Location
Scotland
Originally posted by gjrc
they lost over 1 million at Stalingrad alone!

Stalin adn his generals had a complete lack or respect for human life. especially their own men!

They were willing to send men to the death to defend their country. But many of the men weren't willing, desertion was high. But would life have been better for the men under Nazi occupation?
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
6,830
Location
London
Originally posted by rare
Yeah. They were much more efficient than their soveit counterparts.

not necessarily, they werent lead by a mad dictator who would happily slaughter 10 million of his own people for starters
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom