Caporegime
Fantastically worked second for Bolton. Becoming a very watchable team under Coyle.
But Carragher saved you from going 1-0 down when your keeper made the 1st of his many spillages. I thought it was Gomes who was king at those.
This so called penalty they should have had (like I said, Benny clearly won the ball) wasn't even deemed worthy of a mention of any kind, go figure![]()


I know the idea of having a job that might require you to move is lost to you cheets, but I do support my local team, thanks.Aye we all cant get fans from places like belfast etc.
its called supporting your local team
Wigan has a population of 90,000

It's not like Spurs have ever been a walkover team in the last 5 or so years. Along with Everton and more recently Man City they've been the most likely team for quite a while to break into the group of clubs that actually compete for the title. All the match today confirmed to me was that Liverpool aren't a mid-table side yet and could compete for that fourth spot if they get some consistency in their game and scalp some higher-ups on the way. Tottenham played as they were expected to play and were lucky not to get finished off before the break and similarly fortunate again to get the winner (but this is not to say Liverpool deserved the victory).Today IMO was confirmation that Spurs now need to be taken seriously,
Who are you talking about?I find it hilarious that a player that wasn't deemed good enough for Spurs now plays for the once mighty Liverpool.![]()
Perhaps the problem then is that these things are still far too open for interpretation - the laws of the game are ridiculously vague for a so-called official document.
Because he's a liar.
They could have been 3-0 up yes, but aren't you forgetting Spurs having 1 cleared off the line long before Liverpool scored? Had that gone in game could have been completely different. More one sided comments being made against Spurs. Liverpool probably should have been in front based on the chances, but if the players are confident enough to take a chance then thats their problem, not Spurs'.
I don't think Spurs are less consistent than last year as for closing the gap, Spurs are quite clearly doing so, a win at the Emirates/Highbury has been unheard of in the last 17 years.
Did they? Spurs like all the other sides in the PL wanted to qualify for the CL, why would they "want" to go out early? As for league form suffering, Spurs have the 2nd best record out of the 4 CL teams in games following CL matches I believe. (United 13 points, Chelsea 10 points, Arsenal 7 points and Spurs 10 points - whereas City have 12 points although have played more games.) After the game against Twente, which from Spurs perspective is meaningless having already qualified the CL ends until February so plenty of time to focus on the league campaign.
City do indeed have a bigger squad for the EL, but they are still only allowed to use the same number of players in it that Spurs/Utd/Chelsea/Arsenal are in the CL, also, they probably have more expectation on them to go and win the EL than Spurs do in the CL. Not to mention also having to play on a Thursday.
As I said, the CL closes until February, unlikely to be many cold games then, especially if Spurs as expected field a weakened side in Twente and finish 2nd thus playing one of the group winners, who play in warmer countries than England.
As said above, better league performances than Arsenal following CL games (and tougher opponents in Europe) and equal with Chelsea. Also, in comparison only 2 points less than City (who have played 6 games following European games rather than the others 5) yet City have been able to rest all their so called starting XI.
Spurs are more than capable to putting out a 2nd string XI if everyone is fit and still competing in both the league and FA Cup.
Gomes - Assou-Ekotto, Gallas, Kaboul, Hutton - Bale, Palacios, Modric, Lennon - Van der Vaart, Crouch could be argued as the best XI based on todays starting team. Now for a 2nd string if players are fit:
Cudicini - Naughton, Dawson, King (Bassong as more likely), Corluka - Kranjcar, Huddlestone, Jenas, Bentley - Defoe, Pavlyuchenko
Although some of those 2nd XI are likely to be in the 1st XI when fully fit (Dawson/Huddlestone) I think you can clearly see 2 very strong possible lineups there - not many sides can offer that.
Cudicini - Naughton, Dawson, King (Bassong as more likely), Corluka - Kranjcar, Huddlestone, Jenas, Bentley - Defoe, Pavlyuchenko
Fantastically worked second for Bolton. Becoming a very watchable team under Coyle.
Get the impression he's actually convinced himself it happened?Stop making things up.

Well Naughtons not world class, King/Dawson aren't ever fit, Corluka is injured, Huddlestone is injured, Bentley is a joke, Jenas is injured isn't he, Kranjcar hasn't shown anything this season.
Here lies the problem, what if it turns out you had to play away to Spartak Moscow, then 3 days later play an early game against City/Utd/Chelsea/Arsenal, would that second string be enough, will that first string be tired, who knows.
Aren't Spurs ALREADY suffering from more injuries than usual due to more games in the same period as last year, its not hugely likely to get better while playing more games than you played last year, against difficult opposition with more travel and with the still fit players also getting less rest due to less backup players.
Are Spurs really playing any worse than last season? I don't think so. The main reason why Spurs were so good at the start of last year is because Defoe and Lennon were in terrific form. Well Lennon is finally starting to beat his man again, delivering dangerous balls and Defoe is back from injury with something to prove...
Are Spurs really playing any worse than last season? I don't think so. The main reason why Spurs were so good at the start of last year is because Defoe and Lennon were in terrific form. Well Lennon is finally starting to beat his man again, delivering dangerous balls and Defoe is back from injury with something to prove...
After seeing Liverpool play yesterday, I'd definitely be in the Hodgson Out camp if I was a Liverpool fan. Liverpool under Hodgson play such carp, boring and cynical football. They received 5 yellow cards and I was surprised that they finished the game with 11 men.
I saw the game yesterday (first 'Pool game in a while) and I couldn't believe that you were resorting to long ball football for most of it. No confidence to play the ball in the middle, which is strange because when you did, you created your best chances. At the end of the day you 'Arsenal'ed' it up - you had two one on ones after you scored and you missed. That's what cost you the points.
God I hate Spurs.
Harry 'Give me lots of money and I will win the lague' Redknapp annoys me so much.
![]()
I said WANT to go out, in terms of, it would probably be better to go out now than face a difficult feature list later in the season, they've made a bundle on CL football already, but if that costs them 4th spot and they are one year wonders in the CL, good for bragging rights, not good for the club.
Winning a game in 17 years doesn't indicate anything, Spurs were good in the second half, Arsenal were woeful, old Arsenal would have run riot and torn Spurs a new one, even last years Arsenal would have done so, this years Arsenal is conceding goals and throwing away games we never would have previously.
I find it fairly funny you think February is a really warm time of the year. IT will be harder to play Spartak Moscow in February than September, or April, its less about the actual fixture, nor the fact that their CL record is better than Arsenals so far(ignore reputation, look at the actual teams and both groups have 3 joke teams in tbh, as said Arsenal suck).
Your goal line clearance couldn't of gone in, the shot happened, it was blocked, thats life, Torres and Maxi's shots weren't saved, both players failed to shoot, would they be saved, we don't know. I was not saying Liverpool deserved to win, I was merely saying those two were crap, and I had no idea what they were up to.
Well Naughtons not world class, King/Dawson aren't ever fit, Corluka is injured, Huddlestone is injured, Bentley is a joke, Jenas is injured isn't he, Kranjcar hasn't shown anything this season.
Here lies the problem, what if it turns out you had to play away to Spartak Moscow, then 3 days later play an early game against City/Utd/Chelsea/Arsenal, would that second string be enough, will that first string be tired, who knows.
Yes, you might play Wolves, then Spartak, then Blackburn, then the second Spartak leg, then have a nice break and play second string against Wigan and win 9-1, then have a good rest before a huge game.
But you might end up playing Utd, then Spartak away, then City, then another CL leg, then a cup game, then Chelsea. Its when reschedualed games + euro games, + hard run of games all come together that could leave Spurs in a pretty poor league position.
Aren't Spurs ALREADY suffering from more injuries than usual due to more games in the same period as last year, its not hugely likely to get better while playing more games than you played last year, against difficult opposition with more travel and with the still fit players also getting less rest due to less backup players.