Not for long, considering the suicidal tendencies and plummeting population. As well it's evolved over time by force of better culture to stop being imperialist.
Strasbourg shooting: Gunman at large after three killed and 12 injured
- Thread starter deuse
- Start date
Not for long, considering the suicidal tendencies and plummeting population. As well it's evolved over time by force of better culture to stop being imperialist.
Natural resource poor Japan over extended itself fighting most of South East Asia and the far larger USA in ww2 and had some bad outcomes in a few key naval battles that turned the tides of war against it.
Yes their culture evolved to something maybe better but was not surplanted or replaced.
A superior culture would have realised that well before being absolutely destroyed.
But their culture wasn't destroyed... See above they lost a war but Japan retained its culture (which may have developed since)
It hasn't been destroyed yet, we aren't that far from the war in terms of cultural movements and ultimately China will blow right over it in the future. If only to avenge Manchuria.
Caporegime
I'm not sure you understand how war works.
A culture that took two nukes to stop them. america got "summarily slapped" by a bunch of guys in shorts and t-shirts in Viet Nam before pulling out w/ their tails between their legs. and their culture might have "inherently protected the ideals of immigration" but it didn't look so fondly on the people already there, did it?
IMO China is hardly the bastion of societal morality, BUT, in the context of controlling 2 BILLION people, I think their preventative measures when it comes to radical religion seem to be effective.
I'd like to know their terror attack fatalities per capita, given the enormous land-mass and population.
I'd like to know their terror attack fatalities per capita, given the enormous land-mass and population.
I don't think a lot of people understand how war works - once things have gone past a point of being possible to reconcile with dialogue, etc.
And the better culture developed the means to defeat the lesser one with ease, shocker.
Vietnam is a case of estranged interests at home and largely because of the far superior rules of war that were employed after WW2, European capitalism took over Japan like butter melting in the Sun, inevitable failure.
i guess dropping nukes on cities full of civilians would end a war "w/ ease". not sure where "better culture" fits into that decision though.
vietnam is a case of a "better" culture stomping in big-headed and getting thoroughly humiliated by a bunch of outmanned and outgunned guys. and again the "better culture" attempted some very cultural tactics like drenching the country w/ poisons that seemingly did as much harm to their own troops as it did to the enemy.
i'm still not seeing the "failure" of Japan to which you speak, but then, that's almost a given for your posts.
The Pacific war is typically seen simply as a part of WW2 and an example of unwarranted and unjustifed Japanese aggression, In fact, WW2 only represented the final stage of a conflict that had been ongoing for some 90 years
And the Americans started it!
From Wiki..
Japans rapid industrialization and subsequent resource crisis which drove Japans imperialist era was as a direct response to unwelcome US aggression.
Japan in the 19th century was much like the Anderman islanders today, they just wanted to be left alone!
Soldato
Anyway getting back on topic.. Glad its dead... Any word from 'any' Islamist leaders condemning the attack yet? ? ? ? ? ? calling for an end of attacks on non believers maybe ?? It would go a long way you know ! Who knows maybe even stop it if they all got together and ran a campaign.
And Islam wonders why the world doesn't trust them ?
And Islam wonders why the world doesn't trust them ?
Why the **** would 'Islamist' leaders condemn something they enjoy?
You realise that Islamists are the fundementalist side of things right? The extreme of extremes? The very terrorists themselves? Goodness me.
Not only that but there many leaders of many tribes and they pretty much all disagree with eachother, so how would you expect them to say anything? Such total misunderstanding is boring.
Arrogant cultures tend to do stupid **** that makes them lose, shocker, the US after WW2 suddenly turned into a behemoth with a much inflated ego and now appears to be endeavoring to destroy itself.
Such self-hating westerners in here is well amusing to me considering what this thread is about.
Soldato
Amazed that Mare and Darren Osbourne haven't been mentioned yet. It's not Islamic terror we need to be concerned about in any way!
Islamists are just people who want to promote Islam as a political system, it's not just terrorists, Saudi Arabia is an Islamist state for instance. An Islamist leader could could be very well mean the type of people who hold people to Sharia law standards in this country, or the type of people who promote laws which adhere to Islamic beliefs.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/islamist
