You'll never see 30 on the mixed cycle out of that 2.5 turbo lump!That's probably the best shout. Struggling to think of anything to beat it!
You'll never see 30 on the mixed cycle out of that 2.5 turbo lump!That's probably the best shout. Struggling to think of anything to beat it!
You'll never see 30 on the mixed cycle out of that 2.5 turbo lump!
I have evidence that disagrees!
But the same can be said for it's "rivals". So to claim that the Type R is "cheaper to service than the competition" is an invalid statement...
[TW]Fox;22281776 said:Getting 30 on a run doesnt mean you get 30 on a combined cycle.
If prepared to stretch the budget I'd suggest getting this - http://pistonheads.com/sales/4032137.htm
4 doors, lots of room etc!
Who said it was a "run"? I get 30+ on a cycle.
Thanks
I am baffled to the strict £300 servicing costs....What's another £100, or even £200 more to service? There are LOADS of other things that will dwarf this figure.
p.s. Mazda 3 MPS
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classif.../page/1/radius/1500/postcode/hr11hb?logcode=p
They are cheap because the road tax is a joke.
If prepared to stretch the budget I'd suggest getting this - http://pistonheads.com/sales/4032137.htm
4 doors, lots of room etc!

[TW]Fox;22281851 said:What do you beleive a 'cycle' is?
[TW]Fox;22281851 said:What do you beleive a 'cycle' is?
What you probably mean is that you average 30mpg on a mix of town and motorway driving. Unless this mix is something like 20-30% town and 70-80% motorway this is probably unlikely.
Doesn't really matter though does it when you're looking at this type of car, nothing decent is THAT much cheaper to tax - Plus you're talking about the type of car that needs looking after, tax is the least of your (potential) financial worries

They are cheap because the road tax is a joke.
