It's quite funny watching Arsenal fans discuss transfers.
I would like Fellaini, but he wants £100k a week wages, with his contract it could cost up to £50m (after £22m fee.) Guess what? That's what good players cost.
Another is that you would rather have Higuain over Rooney. Really?
You talk like you can't afford him, you can. You can afford both. Comfortably.
As the old adage goes, buy cheap, buy twice.
Fellani has been in England for 5 seasons and 1/3 of one season he was in form that would be considered 20+mil value. He played that 1/3 of a season as a striker, he's a thug, and big, and most of his goals were more down to top notch delivery and simply being the big guy targetted. I've said before, if we want more goals from set pieces, buying Baines would yield massively better results than Fellani. He's in no way worth 23mil or 100k a week.
As for Rooney, he's NOT a world wide star. Beckham gets mobbed anywhere he goes, Rooney is seen as a big england star, there aren't any girls swooning over him anywhere in the world, as for shirt sales, they are overblown. If a club will sell 2 mil shirts a season, the top player will get the highest amount, thats just how it is. RVP joined Utd and Rooney's shirt sales dropped through the floor and RVP shirt sales rocketted, thats life, new player, biggest player. People buy shirts, the name is simply a choice, they won't sell significantly less shirts if Rooney left, they would just pick a different name.
There are VERY few players who people buy new shirts for when they move to a different team. People buy Real/Ronaldo shirts even if they aren't Real fans, they buy Henry/Barca shirts when he went there, Beckham/galaxy/ac/real/psg shirts. People buy Rooney because he's at Utd, I think you'll find next to no Utd fans buying Rooney shirts at whichever club he might leave for. If he signed for Barca tomorrow, I would think almost no current Utd fan would buy a Rooney/Barca shirt because they love him so much.
With Wenger's system a striker like Rooney who refuses to stay up top and likes to get involved is not going to work well, same with Fellani, we have better defensive and offensive players, and better strikers and look to be buying better strikers than what we have. Who would Fellani play instead of, Santi/Wilshire?
Can Arsenal afford both, yes, with who has gone and increased tv/sponsorship money. Rooney at 200k or more a week is simply a waste, as is Fellani on 100k, there are better options for less in both cases. Having the money available doesn't mean we can't spend it much better than on those two.
My main issue with Rooney is regardless of the player you think he is now, if you rate him as a 200k a week player, or 50k a week player doesn't matter. He appears to be getting worse, caring less, being less fit, struggling with fitness and attitude and playing worse. No matter how good he is or isn't, if you suspect he'll be half the player in two years, a contract at whatever you think he's worth now, on a longer contract, is a huge risk and just bad business. I think he's looking for a payday while he's still worth something, and more intent on a big wage than anything else, threatening your club twice in a couple years to get more money. I don't think he's worth anything near 200k now and I think he'll be significantly further away from that 2 years from now.