Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack

Would you support a military strike on Syria without a UN Security Council resolution?


  • Total voters
    828
  • Poll closed .
David Cameron Warmonger.. lol Didnt get the vote to go the way you want? Call on the ultimate "nerner" card, the royal prerogative....

No one in their right normal mind would use that to declare war in the 21st centuary... its an outdated bit of colonial judiciary.
 
[TW]Fox;24856533 said:
Given that I somewhat doubt we were considered an ally in the late 1700's, I'd imagine that yes, they are.

lol :p The red coats are coming !!!

France can take this war on with the USA since Iraq they always get flack for not helping.
 
Last edited:
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/UN/usvetoes.html

If anyone doubts that USA is a proxy of the israelies you can go here and ask why on everyone of these votes why is it only the us that has vetoed all these motions? When virtually every other nation votes for thr motion and only one ever votes no how can they be anything but a proxy?
 
Last edited:
Nice speech from Kerry but I'd like to something more solid than "We know this and we know that...".

Also, where were the US's oldest ally in the Iraq War?
 
Last edited:
France, the most courageous nation with most feared and non-surrendering soldiers, as was proved by ww1 and ww2.

On other hand, Latvia said it would help USA with the invasion...

Look at their Airforce!! I think I pooped myself.

2200544.jpg
 
The USA seem to be pretty convinced about the evidence that they claim to have.

As for the "Britain is now marginalised...David Cameron hugely weakened by the vote"....erm...democracy in action surely? It went to a vote and a no was the result!
 
Back
Top Bottom