Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack

Would you support a military strike on Syria without a UN Security Council resolution?


  • Total voters
    828
  • Poll closed .
If usa/france strike on syria then it willbe revenge by arab like sucide bomber,etc.. it will be very mess as iraq war was bad... big mistake.. syria has support from iran, russia and some other arabs state.. so dont make other wars again..
 
Mark Bridger, or whoever kills a child in this country, and their is a total man hunt for him, and everyone wants justice.

426 children killed by a Syrian government, and no one really gives a crap - are we that racist that because they i.e. The Syrian people as whole are not as important, let alone 426 children who have been massacred?

Something should have been done regardless of chemical weapons used, or not. What difference does it make, if a machine gun, pistol, or a cannon fire from a gunship mows people to pieces?
 
Mark Bridger, or whoever kills a child in this country, and their is a total man hunt for him, and everyone wants justice.

426 children killed by a Syrian government, and no one really gives a crap - are we that racist that because they i.e. The Syrian people as whole are not as important, let alone 426 children who have been massacred?

Something should have been done regardless of chemical weapons used, or not. What difference does it make, if a machine gun, pistol, or a cannon fire from a gunship mows people to pieces?

Well, do you think the "rebels" who are partly made of extremist such al-queeda have not killed children? Some say that the rebels staged the "gas attacks" videos by gassing children and then filming them.

You see its not as simple as black and white, why should we bomb assads army which by many means is far more civillian friendly than the rebels who have been accused and proved of scalping victims.

Grow up, war is never good and there is no simply "good guys" and "bad guys" war is always bad.
 
Last edited:
Nelly said:
Mark Bridger, or whoever kills a child in this country, and their is a total man hunt for him, and everyone wants justice.

426 children killed by a Syrian government, and no one really gives a crap - are we that racist that because they i.e. The Syrian people as whole are not as important, let alone 426 children who have been massacred?

Something should have been done regardless of chemical weapons used, or not. What difference does it make, if a machine gun, pistol, or a cannon fire from a gunship mows people to pieces?
Lazder said:
Well, do you think the "rebels" who are partly made of extremist such al-queeda have not killed children? Some say that the rebels staged the "gas attacks" videos by gassing children and then filming them.

You see its not as simple as black and white, why should we bomb assads army which by many means is far more civillian friendly than the rebels who have been accused and proved of scalping victims.
It's another Afghanistan, "yeah let's help the rebels..." 10 to 20 years later, the rebels will be plotting attacks against the UK, USA etc - possibly.

100,000+ people died already, whatever happens it's going to get worse.
 
thep02 said:
Proof please, thanks in advance, that kind of proof would be worth billions to the yanks so very kind of you to share it as I will Defo be selling it as soon as you post so again thanks:)
Aww yeah!! Don't read everything what you read on sky news.... :eek:
 
It's another Afghanistan, "yeah let's help the rebels..." 10 to 20 years later, the rebels will be plotting attacks against the UK, USA etc - possibly.

100,000+ people died already, whatever happens it's going to get worse.

Do you realise that ultimately if Syrian rebels had no support from western countries the civil war would be over long time ago, the children would not have needed to die...

Do you realise that if bomb assad and cripple his army, the war will go on for longer, aka the more children will continue to die.

Do you realise that if we help the "rebels" win, extremist government will be installed and over years many more children/women will suffer due to it... Look at Libya now, a country which was well developed is now into stone age where different clans fight for streets, how many children have died as result of that?

Ask a Libyan whether all this was worth the "democracy" which they actually havent got... They had dictatorship that still more or less provided them with decent life, they were promised Democracy with good life... They got total anarchy.

Is that what you want the "children" of Syria to see??
 
Last edited:
Mark Bridger, or whoever kills a child in this country, and their is a total man hunt for him, and everyone wants justice.

426 children killed by a Syrian government, and no one really gives a crap - are we that racist that because they i.e. The Syrian people as whole are not as important, let alone 426 children who have been massacred?

Something should have been done regardless of chemical weapons used, or not. What difference does it make, if a machine gun, pistol, or a cannon fire from a gunship mows people to pieces?
so what about the terrorist atrocities that go largely unreported by western war mongering media?
 
Mark Bridger, or whoever kills a child in this country, and their is a total man hunt for him, and everyone wants justice.

426 children killed by a Syrian government, and no one really gives a crap - are we that racist that because they i.e. The Syrian people as whole are not as important, let alone 426 children who have been massacred?

Something should have been done regardless of chemical weapons used, or not. What difference does it make, if a machine gun, pistol, or a cannon fire from a gunship mows people to pieces?

Of course people give a crap that over 1400 people, including 426 children have died in a CW attack in Syria. However giving a crap doesn't mean that we have to take military action against whoever we know did it. Something will be done, just not same old mistakes we made over Iraq.
 
John Kerry looks like a Spitting Image puppet of a Muppet who's had a stroke.

Did he really say in his speech that 'Intelligence' evidence has been gathered from 'Social media' sites :eek:.
 
Nah lets let them get away with chemical attacks scott free, im sure it wont come back to bite us in the arse. Im off for a pint and some intelligent conversation, so badly lacking here.
 
Back
Top Bottom