Poll: The EU Referendum: How Will You Vote? (June Poll)

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

  • Remain a member of the European Union

    Votes: 794 45.1%
  • Leave the European Union

    Votes: 965 54.9%

  • Total voters
    1,759
Status
Not open for further replies.
that scottish **** can put her points across better than the lot of them.

just a shame shes talking tosh.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I will watch the debate later.

Just want to get this £350million the Brexit are shouting on about, it is wrong I have looked into it a lot as I like to get to the bottom of things.

After all the subsides are paid and everything else our actual cash contribution is £161million per week. I am on your side by the way. ;)

So all in all to be in a neoliberalism group that the EU is, its costing us £1863 pounds a second to be in the EU. :eek:

I think we need that money don't you? VOTE OUT!

Also on further looking into things as my partner is wobbling and getting last minute nerves. No thanks to the Liverpool University ass on Facebook, who if I might add will be out of a job if we leave.
So of course he will vote to stay its bloody obvious.

The EU is a about big business and taking control away from the people to hand to the conglomerates of big businesses and banks.

You vote in and it will be an absolute disaster for the UK and also many other countries in Europe.

I have found a few in voters and one is a manager for the NHS, nuff said. Another is that thick she had to ask her son who is in uni education for advise and he said stay in, so she voting in. :confused:
Another is so old she will be dead by the time we are all suffering. Her excuse,
"I don't want to rock the boat and cause another war" really ! :rolleyes:

The scaremongering by the remain is working on the thick and old, but fortunately not all of us are old or thick. :p

VOTE LEAVE! ;)
 
that scottish dyke can put her points across better than the lot of them.

just a shame shes talking tosh.

She certainly does like interrupting,So rude.

Dont get me wrong,there are strong points coming from both sides but my vote still stays,OUT...Things simply cannot go on as they are changes need to happen.
 
The Process you refer to does nothing, other than remove a small administration charge from a visa process that already existed, and only entitles people to visit.

Anyway, the Turkish argument is the complete rubbish - Turkey will never join the EU while they occupy Northern Cyprus - The Cypriots would veto it
I cant see Turkey just giving it up after 42 years either

So why is the British taxpayer funding a dedicated team in the British Consulate to work on Turkey's accession to the EU?
 
You need to stop adding things that clearly aren't there. Just because they aren't the same thing doesn't mean they are completely unrelated. People are scared about immigration from Turkey, and progress is being made to increase it.
My god, I never said they were.

But visa free entry into the schlagen area is not the same as immigration from turkey! Note I said schlagen area, not the away or the UK. The visa free entry does not affect how Turks can get into the UK...

Progress being made would be related to turkey joining the EU, which is at "best" decades away, at "worse" never. You are either accidentally or purposely conflagating the two independent points!
 
Anyway, the Turkish argument is the complete rubbish - Turkey will never join the EU while they occupy Northern Cyprus

It's not just that - Turkey would have to recognise Cyprus as a sovereign country, which it currently does not do, before it join the EU. I'm surprised it's even completed one of the thirty-five chapters with that stance. (Although that one is for science and research.)
 
But visa free entry into the schlagen area is not the same as immigration from turkey! Note I said schlagen area, not the away or the UK. The visa free entry does not affect how Turks can get into the UK...
I know this. I'm not arguing otherwise.
 
So why is the British taxpayer funding a dedicated team in the British Consulate to work on Turkey's accession to the EU?

I would imagine because it would for one encourage Turkey to turn back from the stupid direction they have recently taken, such as removing press freedoms, as these are the sorts of things that would prevent them from joining

It also keeps onside an ally in a region which becoming ever more unstable, of which we dont have as many as we like

It also could lead to some kind of conclusion for Cyprus, which still is separated by a UN buffer zone (although I doubt this will happen)

Even just stringing them along (knowing they wont join anytime soon) makes a lot of sense
 
About the whole 60% laws coming from the EU, didn't Paxman do a documentary where he found it was between 55% and 60% laws originating from the EU? I'm surprised her argument that it was 13% got so much applause.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom