Poll: The EU Referendum: How Will You Vote? (June Poll)

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

  • Remain a member of the European Union

    Votes: 794 45.1%
  • Leave the European Union

    Votes: 965 54.9%

  • Total voters
    1,759
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think remain will win, however I don't know which way to vote myself.

I dislike the EUROCRATS but because of our debt and economic state we would have a huge recession if we leave. We may have one anyway.

What I really dislike is all these politicians and organisations telling me to vote remain but not why.

They want you to vote Remain because the people who will give them jobs and benefits when they leave Politics will benefit from a Remain vote, so that's what they're told. The fact David Cameron and George Osborne are wanting us to remain in the EU should tell you which way to vote.
 
I think a system of government that no-one understands is a really bad thing. No UK Prime Minister since Mrs Thatcher seems to be able to get a grip on Brussels, which suggest they don't understand it either.

I've asked you this months ago and I don't think you bothered to answer that. Do you completely understand how your local council works? Or our government for that matter.
 
I think a system of government that no-one understands is a really bad thing. No UK Prime Minister since Mrs Thatcher seems to be able to get a grip on Brussels, which suggest they don't understand it either.

What exactly do you mean by "get a grip on" ?

To control it? Well, no obviously they wouldn't - that's not how it's meant to work :p
 
I've asked you this months ago and I don't think you bothered to answer that. Do you completely understand how your local council works? Or our government for that matter.

I understand my local councils (District and County) and UK government a lot better than I understand the EU.

Can you for example tell me - without looking it up; what's the difference between the President of the European Council and the Presidency of the Council of the European Union?

What exactly do you mean by "get a grip on" ?

To control it? Well, no obviously they wouldn't - that's not how it's meant to work :p

I mean get outcomes that benefit the UK.
 
I understand my local councils (District and County) and UK government a lot better than I understand the EU.

Can you for example tell me - without looking it up; what's the difference between the President of the European Council and the Presidency of the Council of the European Union?


I mean get outcomes that benefit the UK.

No I can't, as I already said that basically no one knows and that's why I think this whole thing is ridiculous to be decided by general public.
 
I mean get outcomes that benefit the UK.

Such as the free movement of people, socially and for business, free trade agreements, single market, control over immigration, boosted local economy, more power in the world economy? That sort of thing?
 
Last edited:
No I can't, as I already said that basically no one knows and that's why I think this whole thing is ridiculous to be decided by general public.

Do you get that organisations like the EU are deliberately designed to be "complex" so they can have a lot of very well paid jobs that no one really understands? The top end of business and politics is just filled with old blokes doing favours for each other which they decide over a few rounds of golf, honestly that's how it works
 
No I can't, as I already said that basically no one knows and that's why I think this whole thing is ridiculous to be decided by general public.

If the system isn't easily understandable, then that's not the general public's fault.

Such as the free movement of people, socially and for business, free trade agreements, single market, control over immigration, boosted local economy, more power in the world economy? That sort of thing?

Unsustainable levels of migration, free trade agreements that work for German exporters but not for British business, unprecedented levels of risk to the UK economy thanks to the Euro, unnecessary interference, power wielded ineffectively.
 
Unsustainable levels of migration, free trade agreements that work for German exporters but not for British business, unprecedented levels of risk to the UK economy thanks to the Euro, unnecessary interference, power wielded ineffectively.

All of which have been discussed in this thread in great detail as counter arguments. However, my question still stands: are the benefits I mentioned the sort that you mean?
 
All of which have been discussed in this thread in great detail as counter arguments. However, my question still stands: are the benefits I mentioned the sort that you mean?

Not really, because I don't particularly regard them as net benefits. The sort of outcome I was talking about was for example, getting the rebate on our contributions to the EU.
 
Not really, because I don't particularly regard them as net benefits. The sort of outcome I was talking about was for example, getting the rebate on our contributions to the EU.

Could you provide some insight into why you don't consider the points I listed a net benefit?

Not sure how a rebate on EU contributions is an outcome that would be seen if the UK 'got a grip of Brussels'.
 
Confused yet?....you will be



It isnt that confusing.

We'll do ok outside of the EU. Seriously, we will. The UK won't cease to exist as we know it. I don't think anyone is credibly arguing otherwise.

For me there are pros and cons to remaining in the EU and pros and cons to leaving the EU. Personally I feel the pros of staying vastly outweigh the cons and that is the basis of my view.

Thats half the problem with this whole debate - ridiculous emotive rubbish from both sides that does nothing but devalue the respective arguments.

Will there be World War 3 if we leave? Of course not. Does the EU promote peace within Europe though? Absolutely it does. We we all go bankrupt if we leave? Of course not. Will be, on balance, worse off? I think probably, yes.

Imagine a debate where the pros and cons are intelligently debated and facts are used to backup arguments instead of just constant garbage about mass wars and 88 million benefit stealers coming our way.
 
Will be, on balance, worse off? I think probably, yes.

Im interested why this is. You might be right but on the track record of the EU so far my guess is no we'll eventually be worse off then just staying as a United Kingdom trading normally with any other country of the world including EU.

I think the EU is going to shoot itself in the foot with all its grand gestures and quite extreme economic policies via the ECB. I hope they do ok but it seems to be going that way. Either way we can vote out this government if they screw up, I feel there is far less control of that errant situation on continent and we could easily turn out much better off avoiding it.
Any precedent to suggest EU will go onto success in how it handles Euro, bad debts or whatever is likely to stumble into their path I'd be glad to hear

I agree on the point of diplomacy EU is a positive but its also a nest of bureaucracy and failed oversight

RANsquawk ?@RANsquawk 1h1 hour ago
William Hill latest odds for leave from 21/10 to 2/1 #Brexit
 
Last edited:
Could you provide some insight into why you don't consider the points I listed a net benefit?

Not sure how a rebate on EU contributions is an outcome that would be seen if the UK 'got a grip of Brussels'.

I just have done - unsustainable levels of net migration to the UK for example is the negative consequence of free movement of people. IMO it outweighs any benefit we get from it.
 
[TW]Fox;29590091 said:
It isnt that confusing.

We'll do ok outside of the EU. Seriously, we will. The UK won't cease to exist as we know it. I don't think anyone is credibly arguing otherwise.

For me there are pros and cons to remaining in the EU and pros and cons to leaving the EU. Personally I feel the pros of staying vastly outweigh the cons and that is the basis of my view.

Thats half the problem with this whole debate - ridiculous emotive rubbish from both sides that does nothing but devalue the respective arguments.

Will there be World War 3 if we leave? Of course not. Does the EU promote peace within Europe though? Absolutely it does. We we all go bankrupt if we leave? Of course not. Will be, on balance, worse off? I think probably, yes.

Imagine a debate where the pros and cons are intelligently debated and facts are used to backup arguments instead of just constant garbage about mass wars and 88 million benefit stealers coming our way.

From previous posts you must feel let down by the stay campaign as you have highlighted their claims.

I am a leaver but can sympathise the real debate never got out, it was shrouded but these ridiculous claims.

I think we have all been let down.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom