Imriel Morgan has been revealed as the shouty offensive black woman on the ITV show who has worked for the Huffington Post and is a professional diversity blogger. Shouldn't ITV had made that clear rather than pretend she was just passing the studio when asked to submit a question.
Poll: The EU Referendum: How Will You Vote? (June Poll)
- Thread starter Rilot
- Start date
- Status
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Channel-raising-prospect-freed-try-again.html
EU rules that France may not detain migrants who illegally attempt to enter Britain. Tell me again why staying in the EU helps secure our borders Mr Cameron?
EU rules that France may not detain migrants who illegally attempt to enter Britain. Tell me again why staying in the EU helps secure our borders Mr Cameron?
Got a source John? I have to admit my suspicions were roused by the difference in attitudes between Farage's questioners and Cameron's. Reminds me of that Tory plant in the Question Time audience who gave Milliband a hard time.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3630039/PM-Farage-battle-Brexit-primetime-referendum-special-Cameron-won-t-debate-EU-head-head.html
Scroll down for her picture.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/imriel-morgan/
@ImiMorgan
"Freelance Content Marketer, Growth Hacker, Diversity Advocate, Co-Founder @ShoutOutLdn, Co-host @MelaninMille. 'I don't argue to convert, I argue to be heard.'"
Doesn't work then either.
Last edited:
How would the UK leaving the EU alter the rules that France has to comply with when dealing with illegal migrants?
Would be disturbing if they did
Exactly - how does staying in benefit us in this regard when France isn't allowed to help us secure our borders at the moment?
So anything that affects us that we can't control currently, and won't be altered by Brexit, is a reason to leave 
You can admit that you took a misleading DM article at face value if you want, but we aren't affected by the directive in question and can protect our borders against illegal migration if we choose to.
You can admit that you took a misleading DM article at face value if you want, but we aren't affected by the directive in question and can protect our borders against illegal migration if we choose to.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 3 Oct 2014
- Posts
- 1,774
Not forgetting Camerons special deal for in work benefits lasts for seven years only, then we are back to normal.
Last edited:
This is my point - so where's the value in staying in? At least if we're out we can do something about legal migration.
![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
What?
That would only be a valid comment if the only purpose of the EU was to stop illegal migrants entering from France!
[TW]Fox;29595916 said:
On last nights' town hall debate, Mr Cameron claimed that being in the EU was better because by working together we improved security. This article shows that far from working together, the EU actively prevents France from helping us combat the problem of illegal immigration.
Because there's a reasonable amount of control over legal migration as it stands (generally speaking, immigration is a positive anyway) and there are other benefits to staying in.
Voting out for the purpose of potentially being able to cut down further on legal immigration whilst ignoring all the other benefits being lost is like cutting your nose off to spite your face.
I don't think anyone is saying that the potential isn't there to reduce legal immigration if we left - that is obvious - but given that it's not really that big a deal and due to the higher risk and the other benefits we'd lose, that seems a bit of an odd viewpoint to take.
Don't we have to get permission from all 27 other member states as well before the emergency brake can be applied?
Well I suggest the chap in the audience who told Mr Cameron he couldn't get a GP appointment and his town had been turned into a no-go area because of immigration would probably disagree that immigration was generally positive.
In what way?
Then that would suggest he doesn't understand the meaning of the word 'generally'.
Anyone can quote isolated incidents but statistically, it is generally positive.
- Status